Tiadi Aimé, Seassau Magali, Gerard Christophe-Loïc, Bucci Maria Pia
UMR 1141 Institut National de la Santé Et de Recherche Médicale- Paris Diderot, Robert Debré Hospital, Paris, France.
e(ye) Brain, Ivry sur Seine, France.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0159190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159190. eCollection 2016.
The object of this study was to explore further phonological visual-auditory recognition tasks in a group of fifty-six healthy children (mean age: 9.9 ± 0.3) and to compare these data to those recorded in twenty-six age-matched dyslexic children (mean age: 9.8 ± 0.2). Eye movements from both eyes were recorded using an infrared video-oculography system (MobileEBT® e(y)e BRAIN). The recognition task was performed under four conditions in which the target object was displayed either with phonologically unrelated objects (baseline condition), or with cohort or rhyme objects (cohort and rhyme conditions, respectively), or both together (rhyme + cohort condition). The percentage of the total time spent on the targets and the latency of the first saccade on the target were measured. Results in healthy children showed that the percentage of the total time spent in the baseline condition was significantly longer than in the other conditions, and that the latency of the first saccade in the cohort condition was significantly longer than in the other conditions; interestingly, the latency decreased significantly with the increasing age of the children. The developmental trend of phonological awareness was also observed in healthy children only. In contrast, we observed that for dyslexic children the total time spent on the target was similar in all four conditions tested, and also that they had similar latency values in both cohort and rhyme conditions. These findings suggest a different sensitivity to the phonological competitors between dyslexic and non-dyslexic children. Also, the eye-tracking technique provides online information about phonological awareness capabilities in children.
本研究的目的是进一步探索56名健康儿童(平均年龄:9.9±0.3岁)的语音视觉-听觉识别任务,并将这些数据与26名年龄匹配的诵读困难儿童(平均年龄:9.8±0.2岁)记录的数据进行比较。使用红外视频眼动描记系统(MobileEBT® e(y)e BRAIN)记录双眼的眼动。识别任务在四种条件下进行,其中目标物体要么与语音无关的物体一起显示(基线条件),要么与同韵词或押韵词物体一起显示(分别为同韵词和押韵条件),或者两者一起显示(押韵+同韵词条件)。测量了注视目标的总时间百分比和首次扫视目标的潜伏期。健康儿童的结果表明,在基线条件下花费的总时间百分比明显长于其他条件,并且在同韵词条件下首次扫视的潜伏期明显长于其他条件;有趣的是,潜伏期随着儿童年龄的增加而显著降低。仅在健康儿童中也观察到了语音意识的发展趋势。相比之下,我们观察到,对于诵读困难儿童,在所有四种测试条件下注视目标的总时间相似,并且在同韵词和押韵条件下他们的潜伏期值也相似。这些发现表明诵读困难儿童和非诵读困难儿童对语音竞争者的敏感性不同。此外,眼动追踪技术提供了有关儿童语音意识能力的在线信息。