Louer Craig R, Boone Sean L, Guthrie Andre K, Motley John R, Calfee Ryan P, Wall Lindley B
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Center, Barnes-Jewish West County Hospital, Chesterfield, Missouri.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jul 20;98(14):1176-82. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00963.
The physical risk factors leading to distal radial fractures are poorly understood. The goal of this study was to compare postural stability between older adults with and without a prior distal radial fragility fracture.
This case-control evaluation was performed at a single tertiary institution. The fracture cohort comprised 23 patients treated for a low-energy distal radial fracture within 6 to 24 months prior to this study. Twenty-three age and sex-matched control participants, without a prior fragility fracture, were selected from an outpatient clinic population. All participants completed a balance assessment with a computerized balance platform device. Dynamic motion analysis (DMA) scores ranging from 0 to 1,440 points are produced, with lower scores indicating better postural stability. Participants also completed validated questionnaires for general health quality (EuroQol-5D-3L [EQ-5D-3L]) and physical activity (Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly [PASE]) and comprehensive health and demographic information including treatment for compromised balance or osteoporosis. Statistical analysis compared data between cases and controls using either the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U test.
There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in age, sex, body mass index, physical activity score, or EQ-5D-3L general health visual analog scale score between participants with or without prior distal radial fracture. The fracture cohort demonstrated poorer balance, with higher DMA scores at 933 points compared with 790 points for the control cohort (p = 0.008). Nineteen patients (83%) in the fracture cohort reported having dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans within 5 years prior to this study, but only 2 patients (9%) had ever been referred for balance training with physical therapy.
Older adults who sustain low-energy distal radial fractures demonstrate impaired postural stability compared with individuals of a similar age who have not sustained such fractures. Following a distal radial fracture, these patients may benefit from interventions to improve postural stability.
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
导致桡骨远端骨折的物理风险因素尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较有和没有桡骨远端脆性骨折病史的老年人的姿势稳定性。
本病例对照评估在一家三级医疗机构进行。骨折队列包括23例在本研究前6至24个月接受低能量桡骨远端骨折治疗的患者。从门诊人群中选取23名年龄和性别匹配、无既往脆性骨折的对照参与者。所有参与者均使用计算机化平衡平台设备完成平衡评估。生成的动态运动分析(DMA)分数范围为0至1440分,分数越低表明姿势稳定性越好。参与者还完成了关于一般健康质量(欧洲五维健康量表-3水平[EQ-5D-3L])和身体活动(老年人身体活动量表[PASE])的有效问卷,以及包括平衡受损或骨质疏松治疗在内的综合健康和人口统计学信息。统计分析使用Student t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验比较病例组和对照组的数据。
有或无既往桡骨远端骨折的参与者在年龄、性别、体重指数、身体活动评分或EQ-5D-3L一般健康视觉模拟量表评分方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。骨折队列的平衡能力较差,DMA评分为933分,高于对照组的790分(p=0.008)。骨折队列中的19名患者(83%)报告在本研究前5年内进行了双能X线吸收法(DXA)扫描,但只有2名患者(9%)曾被转诊接受物理治疗平衡训练。
与未发生此类骨折的同龄人相比,发生低能量桡骨远端骨折的老年人姿势稳定性受损。桡骨远端骨折后,这些患者可能受益于改善姿势稳定性的干预措施。
预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。