• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)第三部分人格特质在区分边缘型人格障碍与对照组中的效用

Utility of DSM-5 section III personality traits in differentiating borderline personality disorder from comparison groups.

作者信息

Bach B, Sellbom M, Bo S, Simonsen E

机构信息

Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand, Fælledvej 6, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark.

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;37:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.04.006
PMID:27442979
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a highly prevalent diagnosis in mental health care and includes a heterogeneous constellation of symptoms. As the field of personality disorder (PD) research moves to emphasize dimensional traits in its operationalization, it is important to determine how the alternative DSM-5 Section III personality trait dimensions differentiates such features in BPD patients versus comparison groups. To date, no study has attempted such validation.

METHOD

The current study examined the utility of the DSM-5 trait dimensions in differentiating patients with the categorical DSM-IV/5 diagnosis of BPD (n=101) from systematically matched samples of other PD patients (n=101) and healthy controls (n=101). This was investigated using one-way ANOVA and multinomial logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Results indicated that Emotional Lability, Risk Taking, and Suspiciousness uniquely differentiated BPD patients from other PD patients, whereas Emotional Lability, Depressivity, and Suspiciousness uniquely differentiated BPD patients from healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

Emotional Lability is in particular a key BPD feature of the proposed Section III model, whereas Suspiciousness also augments essential BPD features. Provided that these findings are replicated cross-culturally in forthcoming research, a more parsimonious traits operationalization of BPD features is warranted.

摘要

目的

边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是心理健康护理中一种高度常见的诊断,包含一系列异质性症状。随着人格障碍(PD)研究领域在其操作化过程中转向强调维度特质,确定替代的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)-5第三部分人格特质维度如何区分BPD患者与对照组的此类特征非常重要。迄今为止,尚无研究尝试进行此类验证。

方法

本研究检验了DSM-5特质维度在区分患有分类性DSM-IV/5诊断的BPD患者(n = 101)与其他PD患者(n = 101)及健康对照(n = 101)的系统匹配样本方面的效用。使用单因素方差分析和多项逻辑回归分析对此进行了研究。

结果

结果表明,情绪不稳定、冒险和猜疑将BPD患者与其他PD患者独特地区分开来,而情绪不稳定、抑郁和猜疑则将BPD患者与健康对照独特地区分开来。

结论

情绪不稳定尤其是拟议的第三部分模型的关键BPD特征,而猜疑也增强了基本的BPD特征。倘若这些发现在即将开展的研究中得到跨文化重复验证,则有必要对BPD特征进行更简洁的特质操作化。

相似文献

1
Utility of DSM-5 section III personality traits in differentiating borderline personality disorder from comparison groups.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)第三部分人格特质在区分边缘型人格障碍与对照组中的效用
Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;37:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
2
Continuity between DSM-5 Categorical Criteria and Traits Criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中边缘型人格障碍的分类标准与特质标准之间的连续性。
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;61(8):489-94. doi: 10.1177/0706743716640756. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
3
Convergence between DSM-5 Section II and Section III diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder.DSM-5 第二部分和第三部分边缘型人格障碍诊断标准的趋同。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;48(4):325-32. doi: 10.1177/0004867413511997. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
4
Borderline Personality Disorder and Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Dimensional personality assessment with DSM-5.边缘型人格障碍与 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5):DSM-5 维度的人格评估
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;70:105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
5
Borderline Personality Disorder and Narcissistic Personality Disorder Diagnoses From the Perspective of the DSM-5 Personality Traits: A Study on Italian Clinical Participants.从《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格特质角度看边缘型人格障碍和自恋型人格障碍的诊断:一项针对意大利临床参与者的研究
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Dec;204(12):939-949. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000587.
6
Differentiating bipolar disorder from borderline personality disorder: Diagnostic accuracy of the difficulty in emotion regulation scale and personality inventory for DSM-5.双相情感障碍与边缘型人格障碍的鉴别:DSM-5 情绪调节困难量表和人格问卷的诊断准确性。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:856-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.079. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Comparing External Correlates of DSM-5 Section II and Section III Dimensional Trait Operationalizations of Borderline Personality Disorder.比较《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中边缘型人格障碍第二节和第三节维度特质操作化的外部关联因素。
J Pers Disord. 2016 Apr;30(2):193-210. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_189. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
8
Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model for borderline personality disorder: Differential diagnostic accuracy of the BFI, SCID-II-PQ, and PID-5.DSM-5 边缘型人格障碍替代模型的临床实用性:BFI、SCID-II-PQ 和 PID-5 的鉴别诊断准确性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;80:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
Construct Validity of the DSM-5 Section III Personality Trait Profile for Borderline Personality Disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版第三部分边缘型人格障碍人格特质概况的结构效度
J Pers Assess. 2015 Sep-Oct;97(5):478-86. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1051226. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Continuity between DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality traits for obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.DSM-5 第二部分和第三部分特质障碍中强迫症人格障碍特征的连续性。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Jan;25(1):144-151. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2147. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-walking personality disorder types to ICD-11 trait domains: An overview of current findings.将人格障碍类型与《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)特质领域进行交叉对照:当前研究结果概述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 6;14:1175425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1175425. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychotic spectrum features in borderline and bipolar disorders within the scope of the DSM-5 section III personality traits: a case control study.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版第三部分人格特质范围内边缘性和双相情感障碍中的精神病性谱系特征:一项病例对照研究
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Jan 16;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00205-w.
3
Examining the Construct Validity of Borderline Personality Traits Using Familial Aggregation and Other External Validators.
使用家族聚集性和其他外部效标检验边缘型人格特质的建构效度。
J Pers Disord. 2022 Dec;36(6):641-661. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.641.
4
Maladaptive personality traits as predictors of prosocial and trusting behavior in two economic games.不良适应型人格特质作为两种经济博弈中亲社会行为和信任行为的预测指标
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2022 Nov 10;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00201-0.
5
Maladaptive personality traits may link childhood trauma history to current internalizing symptoms.适应不良的人格特质可能会将童年创伤史与当前的内化症状联系起来。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Oct;63(5):468-475. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12830. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Criteria A and B of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) Capture Borderline Personality Features Among Adolescents.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的标准A和标准B涵盖了青少年的边缘型人格特征。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 11;13:828301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.828301. eCollection 2022.
7
Maladaptive behaviours in adolescence and their associations with personality traits, emotion dysregulation and other clinical features in a sample of Italian students: a cross-sectional study.意大利学生样本中青少年的适应不良行为及其与人格特质、情绪调节障碍和其他临床特征的关联:一项横断面研究。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 May 4;8(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00154-w.
8
Differences between ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD on DSM-5 section III personality traits.国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍(ICD - 11 PTSD)与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版第三部分人格特质中的复杂性创伤后应激障碍(complex PTSD)之间的差异。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Apr 13;12(1):1894805. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1894805.
9
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型研究的简要但全面的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Aug 13;21(9):92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
10
The role of DSM-5 borderline personality symptomatology and traits in the link between childhood trauma and suicidal risk in psychiatric patients.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)边缘型人格症状学及特质在儿童期创伤与精神病患者自杀风险之间联系中的作用
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017 Jun 18;4:12. doi: 10.1186/s40479-017-0063-7. eCollection 2017.