Bach Bo, Sellbom Martin
Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;61(8):489-94. doi: 10.1177/0706743716640756. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) includes a heterogeneous constellation of symptoms operationalized with 9 categorical criteria. As the field of personality disorder (PD) research moves to emphasize dimensional traits in its operationalization, it is important to delineate continuity between the 9 DSM-IV/Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) categorical criteria for BPD and the trait dimensions in DSM-5 Section III. To date, no study has attempted such validation.
We examined the associations between the 9 categorical DSM-IV/DSM-5 criteria for BPD and the trait dimensions of the alternative DSM-5 model for PDs in consecutively recruited psychiatric outpatients (N = 142; 68% female; age: mean 29.02, SD 8.38). This was investigated by means of bivariate correlations, followed by multiple logistic regression analysis.
The categorical BPD criteria were associated with conceptually related DSM-5 Section III traits (P > 0.001), except for the criterion of chronic feelings of emptiness. Consistent with the proposed traits criteria for BPD in DSM-5 Section III, we found Emotional lability, Anxiousness, Separation insecurity, Depressivity, Impulsivity, Risk taking, and Hostility to capture conceptually coherent BPD categorical criteria, while Suspiciousness was also strongly associated with BPD criteria. At the domain level, this applied to Negative affectivity, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. Notably, Emotional lability, Impulsivity, and Suspiciousness emerged as unique predictors of BPD (P > 0.05).
In addition to the proposed BPD traits criteria, Suspiciousness and features of Psychoticism also augment BPD features. Provided that these findings are replicated in forthcoming research, a modified traits operationalization of BPD is warranted.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)包含一系列异质性症状,通过9条分类标准进行操作化定义。随着人格障碍(PD)研究领域在操作化过程中越来越强调维度特质,明确《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)/《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中BPD的9条分类标准与DSM-5第三部分中的特质维度之间的连续性非常重要。迄今为止,尚无研究尝试进行此类验证。
我们在连续招募的精神科门诊患者(N = 142;68%为女性;年龄:平均29.02岁,标准差8.38)中,研究了BPD的9条DSM-IV/DSM-5分类标准与PD的替代DSM-5模型的特质维度之间的关联。通过双变量相关性分析进行研究,随后进行多元逻辑回归分析。
除了长期空虚感这一标准外,BPD的分类标准与概念上相关的DSM-5第三部分特质相关(P > 0.001)。与DSM-5第三部分中提议的BPD特质标准一致,我们发现情绪不稳定、焦虑、分离不安全感、抑郁性、冲动性、冒险性和敌意能够涵盖概念上连贯的BPD分类标准,而猜疑也与BPD标准密切相关。在领域层面,这适用于消极情感性、去抑制和精神病性。值得注意的是,情绪不稳定、冲动性和猜疑是BPD的独特预测因素(P > 0.05)。
除了提议的BPD特质标准外,猜疑和精神病性特征也增强了BPD的特征。倘若这些发现在后续研究中得到重复验证,那么对BPD进行修正的特质操作化定义是有必要的。