1Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;48(4):325-32. doi: 10.1177/0004867413511997. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common mental health condition in psychiatric settings. The current study examined the overlap between the operationalization of BPD listed in Section II (Diagnostic Criteria and Codes) and the alternative, dimensional personality trait-based operationalization listed in Section III (Emerging Measures and Models) of the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Moreover, the unique contributions of specific personality traits for indexing the traditional BPD operationalization were also evaluated, including conceptually relevant traits not originally proposed for Section III BPD.
Participants were 145 consecutive patients from a psychiatric unit in a hospital in the USA. These individuals completed a series of questionnaires that index both traditional (DSM-IV/DSM-5 Section II) and alternative (DSM-5 Section III personality traits) diagnostic criteria for BPD.
Structural equation modeling results revealed that latent constructs representing the Section II and Section III operationalizations of BPD, respectively, overlapped substantially (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). Hierarchical latent regression models indicated that at least five of the seven traits proposed to define Section III BPD uniquely accounted for variance (69%) in a latent Section II BPD variable. Finally, at least one other conceptually relevant trait (Perceptual Dysregulation) augmented the prediction of latent BPD scores.
The proposed personality traits for Section III BPD are clearly aligned with traditional conceptualizations of this important personality disorder construct. At least five of the seven dimensional traits proposed to define Section III contributed uniquely to the characterization of Section II BPD, and these traits can be augmented by Perceptual Dysregulation. If replicated in other settings, these findings might warrant some modification to the operationalization of DSM-5 Section III BPD.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是精神科常见的心理健康状况。本研究考察了当前《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)第二部分(诊断标准和编码)列出的 BPD 操作化与第三部分(新兴测量和模型)列出的替代性、维度人格特质操作化之间的重叠。此外,还评估了特定人格特质对索引传统 BPD 操作化的独特贡献,包括最初未为第三部分 BPD 提出的概念上相关的特质。
参与者是来自美国一家医院精神病科的 145 名连续患者。这些人完成了一系列问卷,这些问卷分别索引 BPD 的传统(DSM-IV/DSM-5 第二部分)和替代(DSM-5 第三部分人格特质)诊断标准。
结构方程模型结果显示,分别代表 BPD 的第二部分和第三部分操作化的潜在结构重叠很大(r = 0.86,p <0.001)。分层潜在回归模型表明,在定义第三部分 BPD 的七个特质中,至少有五个特质可以独特地解释潜在第二部分 BPD 变量的方差(69%)。最后,至少还有一个其他概念上相关的特质(知觉失调)增强了潜在 BPD 评分的预测。
第三部分 BPD 的拟议人格特质显然与这种重要人格障碍结构的传统概念相一致。在定义第三部分的七个维度特质中,至少有五个特质可以独特地为第二部分 BPD 的特征提供信息,而这些特质可以通过知觉失调来增强。如果在其他环境中得到复制,这些发现可能需要对 DSM-5 第三部分 BPD 的操作化进行一些修改。