Chaturvedi Seemant, Turan Tanya N, Lynn Michael J, Derdeyn Colin P, Fiorella David, Janis L Scott, Chimowitz Marc I
From the Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL (S.C.); Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (T.N.T., M.I.C.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (M.J.L.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis MO (C.P.D.); Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY (D.F.); and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD (L.S.J.).
Stroke. 2015 Sep;46(9):2562-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009656. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
The Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) medical group had a much lower primary end point rate than predicted from the preceding Warfarin Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial. This result has been attributed to the aggressive medical therapy used in SAMMPRIS, but an alternative hypothesis is that SAMMPRIS patients were at lower risk. We undertook analyses to evaluate these competing hypotheses.
Using proportional hazards regression, we compared the SAMMPRIS primary end point between SAMMPRIS medical patients and WASID patients meeting the same qualifying criteria adjusted for confounding baseline characteristics.
The unadjusted comparison of the SAMMPRIS primary end point showed a significantly higher risk for WASID patients (P=0.009, logrank test) with 12 month Kaplan-Meier estimates of 21.9% in WASID and 12.6% in SAMMPRIS and hazard ratio 1.9 (95% confidence interval =1.2-3.0). The analyses identified the following confounding factors that varied between the studies and that conferred a higher risk: lack of statin use at enrollment (hazard ratio =1.8, 95% confidence interval =1.1-2.9, P=0.027) that was more prevalent among WASID patients (39% versus 14%, P<0.0001) and prior infarcts in the territory of the symptomatic vessel (hazard ratio =1.8, 95% confidence interval =1.1-2.9, P=0.023) that was more prevalent among SAMMPRIS patients (34% versus 22%, P=0.015).The hazard ratio for WASID versus SAMMPRIS adjusted for these 2 characteristics was 1.9 (95% confidence interval =1.1-3.2).
After adjustment for confounding baseline characteristics, WASID patients had an almost 2-fold higher risk of the SAMMPRIS primary end point, which supports the hypothesis that the lower rate of the primary end point in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS compared with WASID patients was as a result of the aggressive medical management used in SAMMPRIS.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.
颅内狭窄支架置入与积极药物治疗预防复发性卒中(SAMMPRIS)医疗组的主要终点发生率远低于先前华法林阿司匹林治疗有症状颅内疾病(WASID)试验的预测值。这一结果归因于SAMMPRIS中使用的积极药物治疗,但另一种假设是SAMMPRIS患者风险较低。我们进行了分析以评估这些相互竞争的假设。
使用比例风险回归,我们比较了符合相同合格标准并针对混杂基线特征进行调整的SAMMPRIS医疗组患者与WASID患者的SAMMPRIS主要终点。
SAMMPRIS主要终点的未调整比较显示,WASID患者风险显著更高(P = 0.009,对数秩检验),12个月的Kaplan-Meier估计值在WASID中为21.9%,在SAMMPRIS中为12.6%,风险比为1.9(95%置信区间 = 1.2 - 3.0)。分析确定了以下在研究之间有所不同且具有较高风险的混杂因素:入组时未使用他汀类药物(风险比 = 1.8,95%置信区间 = 1.1 - 2.9,P = 0.0