Suppr超能文献

使用X射线光电子能谱(XPS)和拉曼光谱对少层纳米石墨结构中的缺陷进行估计的比较研究。

A comparative study on defect estimation using XPS and Raman spectroscopy in few layer nanographitic structures.

作者信息

Ganesan K, Ghosh Subrata, Gopala Krishna Nanda, Ilango S, Kamruddin M, Tyagi A K

机构信息

Materials Science Group, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam - 603102, India.

Corrosion Science and Technology Group, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam - 603102, India.

出版信息

Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 Aug 10;18(32):22160-7. doi: 10.1039/c6cp02033j.

Abstract

Defects in planar and vertically oriented nanographitic structures (NGSs) synthesized by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) have been investigated using Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. While Raman spectra reveal the dominance of vacancy and boundary type defects respectively in vertical and planar NGSs, XPS provides additional information on vacancy related defect peaks in the C 1s spectrum, which originate from non-conjugated carbon atoms in the hexagonal lattice. Although an excellent correlation prevails between these two techniques, our results show that estimation of surface defects by XPS is more accurate than Raman analysis. Nuances of these techniques are discussed in the context of assessing defects in nanographitic structures.

摘要

利用拉曼光谱和X射线光电子能谱对通过等离子体增强化学气相沉积(PECVD)合成的平面和垂直取向的纳米石墨结构(NGS)中的缺陷进行了研究。拉曼光谱分别揭示了垂直和平面NGS中空位和边界型缺陷的主导地位,而XPS提供了关于C 1s光谱中空位相关缺陷峰的额外信息,这些缺陷峰源自六边形晶格中的非共轭碳原子。尽管这两种技术之间存在良好的相关性,但我们的结果表明,通过XPS评估表面缺陷比拉曼分析更准确。在评估纳米石墨结构中的缺陷时,讨论了这些技术的细微差别。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验