Ganesan K, Ghosh Subrata, Gopala Krishna Nanda, Ilango S, Kamruddin M, Tyagi A K
Materials Science Group, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam - 603102, India.
Corrosion Science and Technology Group, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam - 603102, India.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 Aug 10;18(32):22160-7. doi: 10.1039/c6cp02033j.
Defects in planar and vertically oriented nanographitic structures (NGSs) synthesized by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) have been investigated using Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. While Raman spectra reveal the dominance of vacancy and boundary type defects respectively in vertical and planar NGSs, XPS provides additional information on vacancy related defect peaks in the C 1s spectrum, which originate from non-conjugated carbon atoms in the hexagonal lattice. Although an excellent correlation prevails between these two techniques, our results show that estimation of surface defects by XPS is more accurate than Raman analysis. Nuances of these techniques are discussed in the context of assessing defects in nanographitic structures.
利用拉曼光谱和X射线光电子能谱对通过等离子体增强化学气相沉积(PECVD)合成的平面和垂直取向的纳米石墨结构(NGS)中的缺陷进行了研究。拉曼光谱分别揭示了垂直和平面NGS中空位和边界型缺陷的主导地位,而XPS提供了关于C 1s光谱中空位相关缺陷峰的额外信息,这些缺陷峰源自六边形晶格中的非共轭碳原子。尽管这两种技术之间存在良好的相关性,但我们的结果表明,通过XPS评估表面缺陷比拉曼分析更准确。在评估纳米石墨结构中的缺陷时,讨论了这些技术的细微差别。