van den Oever Martien, Molenveld Karin
Wageningen UR-Food & Biobased Research, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen UR-Food & Biobased Research, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
N Biotechnol. 2017 Jul 25;37(Pt A):48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
Larger scale market introduction of new bio-based products requires a clear advantage regarding sustainability, as well as an adequate techno-economic positioning relative to fossil based products. In a previous paper [Broeren et al., 2016], LCA results per kg and per functionality equivalent of bio-based plastics were presented, together with economic considerations. The present paper discusses the mechanical and thermal properties of a range of commercially available bio-based plastics based on polylactic acid (PLA), cellulose esters, starch and polyamides, and the feasibility of replacing fossil-based counterparts based on performance. The evaluation is approached from an end user perspective. First, potentially suitable bio-based plastics are selected based on manufacturers' specifications in technical data sheets, then a first experimental evaluation is performed on injection moulded ISO specimens, and finally a further selection of plastics is tested on large 50×70cm panels. This technical feasibility study indicates that so far bio-based plastics do not completely match the properties of high performance materials like flame retardant V-0 PC/ABS blends used in electronic devices. The performance gap is being decreased by the development of stereocomplex PLA and hybrid PLA blends with polycarbonate, which offer clearly improved properties with respect to maximum usage temperature and toughness. In addition, several materials meet the V-0 flammability requirements needed in specific durable applications. On the other hand, improving these properties so far has negative consequences for the bio-based content. This study also shows that replacement of bulk polymers like PS is feasible using PLA compounds with a bio-based content as high as 85%.
新型生物基产品在更大规模上推向市场需要在可持续性方面具有明显优势,以及相对于化石基产品具备适当的技术经济定位。在之前的一篇论文[Broeren等人,2016年]中,展示了每千克生物基塑料以及每功能当量的生命周期评估结果,并结合了经济考量。本文讨论了一系列基于聚乳酸(PLA)、纤维素酯、淀粉和聚酰胺的市售生物基塑料的机械和热性能,以及基于性能替代化石基同类产品的可行性。评估是从终端用户的角度进行的。首先,根据制造商技术数据表中的规格选择潜在合适的生物基塑料,然后对注塑成型的ISO试样进行首次实验评估,最后在50×70厘米的大型面板上对进一步筛选出的塑料进行测试。这项技术可行性研究表明,到目前为止,生物基塑料还不能完全匹配电子设备中使用的高性能材料(如阻燃V-0 PC/ABS共混物)的性能。立体复合PLA以及PLA与聚碳酸酯的混合共混物的开发正在缩小性能差距,这些共混物在最高使用温度和韧性方面有明显改善。此外,几种材料满足特定耐用应用所需的V-0阻燃要求。另一方面,到目前为止,改善这些性能对生物基含量有负面影响。这项研究还表明,使用生物基含量高达85%的PLA化合物替代PS等大宗聚合物是可行的。