Botelho Leonardo M, Morales-Quezada Leon, Rozisky Joanna R, Brietzke Aline P, Torres Iraci L S, Deitos Alicia, Fregni Felipe, Caumo Wolnei
Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto Alegre, Brazil; Pain and Palliative Care Service at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto Alegre, Brazil; Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegrePorto Alegre, Brazil.
Laboratory of Neuromodulation of Spaulding Rehabilitation of Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 27;10:308. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00308. eCollection 2016.
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain. However, its neurobiological mechanisms are not entirely elucidated. Given the complex interaction between the networks involved in pain process, our approach, to providing insights into the neural mechanisms of pain, was to investigate the relationship between neurophysiological, neurochemical and clinical outcomes such as corticospinal excitability. Recent evidence has demonstrated that three neural systems are affected in chronic pain: (i) motor corticospinal system; (ii) internal descending pain modulation system; and (iii) the system regulating neuroplasticity. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to examine the relationship between these three central systems in patients with chronic MPS of whom do/do not respond to the Conditioned Pain Modulation Task (CPM-task). The CPM-task was to immerse her non-dominant hand in cold water (0-1°C) to produce a heterotopic nociceptive stimulus. Corticospinal excitability was the primary outcome; specifically, the motor evoked potential (MEP) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Secondary outcomes were the cortical excitability parameters [current silent period (CSP) and short intracortical inhibition (SICI)], serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), heat pain threshold (HPT), and the disability related to pain (DRP). We included 33 women, (18-65 years old). The MANCOVA model using Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test revealed that non-responders (n = 10) compared to responders (n = 23) presented increased intracortical facilitation (ICF; mean ± SD) 1.43 (0.3) vs. 1.11 (0.12), greater motor-evoked potential amplitude (μV) 1.93 (0.54) vs. 1.40 (0.27), as well a higher serum BDNF (pg/Ml) 32.56 (9.95) vs. 25.59 (10.24), (P < 0.05 for all). Also, non-responders presented a higher level of DRP and decreased HPT (P < 0.05 for all). These findings suggest that the loss of net descending pain inhibition was associated with an increase in ICF, serum BDNF levels, and DRP. We propose a framework to explain the relationship and potential directionality of these factors. In this framework we hypothesize that increased central sensitization leads to a loss of descending pain inhibition that triggers compensatory mechanisms as shown by increased motor cortical excitability.
肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的主要原因。然而,其神经生物学机制尚未完全阐明。鉴于疼痛过程中涉及的网络之间存在复杂的相互作用,我们为深入了解疼痛的神经机制所采用的方法是研究神经生理、神经化学与诸如皮质脊髓兴奋性等临床结果之间的关系。最近的证据表明,慢性疼痛会影响三个神经系统:(i)运动皮质脊髓系统;(ii)内源性下行疼痛调制系统;以及(iii)调节神经可塑性的系统。在这项横断面研究中,我们旨在研究慢性MPS患者中这三个中枢系统之间的关系,这些患者对条件性疼痛调制任务(CPM任务)有/无反应。CPM任务是将她的非优势手浸入冷水中(0 - 1°C)以产生异位伤害性刺激。皮质脊髓兴奋性是主要结果;具体而言,通过经颅磁刺激(TMS)评估运动诱发电位(MEP)和皮质内易化(ICF)。次要结果是皮质兴奋性参数[当前静息期(CSP)和短皮质内抑制(SICI)]、血清脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)、热痛阈值(HPT)以及与疼痛相关的残疾(DRP)。我们纳入了33名女性(18 - 65岁)。使用Bonferroni多重比较检验的多变量协方差分析模型显示,与有反应者(n = 23)相比,无反应者(n = 10)的皮质内易化(ICF;平均值±标准差)增加,分别为1.43(0.3)对1.11(0.12),运动诱发电位幅度(μV)更大,分别为1.93(0.54)对1.40(0.27),血清BDNF水平也更高,分别为32.56(9.95)对25.59(10.24),(所有P < 0.05)。此外,无反应者的DRP水平更高,HPT降低(所有P < 0.05)。这些发现表明,下行性疼痛抑制的丧失与ICF增加、血清BDNF水平升高和DRP增加有关。我们提出了一个框架来解释这些因素之间的关系和潜在的方向性。在这个框架中,我们假设中枢敏化增加会导致下行性疼痛抑制丧失,从而触发如运动皮质兴奋性增加所示的代偿机制。