Potvin Stéphane, Tikàsz Andràs, Mendrek Adrianna
Centre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychology, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Front Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 22;7:115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00115. eCollection 2016.
Reliable evidence shows that schizophrenia patients tend to experience negative emotions when presented with emotionally neutral stimuli. Similarly, several functional neuroimaging studies show that schizophrenia patients have increased activations in response to neutral material. However, results are heterogeneous. Here, we review the functional neuroimaging studies that have addressed this research question. Based on the 36 functional neuroimaging studies that we retrieved, it seems that the increased brain reactivity to neutral stimuli is fairly common in schizophrenia, but that the regions involved vary considerably, apart from the amygdala. Prefrontal and cingulate sub-regions and the hippocampus may also be involved. By contrasts, results in individuals at risk for psychosis are less consistent. In schizophrenia patients, results are less consistent in the case of studies using non-facial stimuli, explicit processing paradigms, and/or event-related designs. This means that human faces may convey subtle information (e.g., trustworthiness) other than basic emotional expressions. It also means that the aberrant brain reactivity to neutral stimuli is less likely to occur when experimental paradigms are too cognitively demanding as well as in studies lacking statistical power. The main hypothesis proposed to account for this increased brain reactivity to neutral stimuli is the aberrant salience hypothesis of psychosis. Other investigators propose that the aberrant brain reactivity to neutral stimuli in schizophrenia results from abnormal associative learning, untrustworthiness judgments, priming effects, and/or reduced habituation to neutral stimuli. In the future, the effects of antipsychotics on this aberrant brain reactivity will need to be determined, as well as the potential implication of sex/gender.
可靠证据表明,精神分裂症患者在面对情绪中性刺激时往往会体验到负面情绪。同样,多项功能性神经影像学研究表明,精神分裂症患者对中性材料的激活增加。然而,结果并不一致。在此,我们回顾了针对这一研究问题的功能性神经影像学研究。根据我们检索到的36项功能性神经影像学研究,似乎大脑对中性刺激反应性增加在精神分裂症中相当常见,但除杏仁核外,涉及的区域差异很大。前额叶和扣带亚区域以及海马体可能也会涉及。相比之下,精神病风险个体的结果不太一致。在精神分裂症患者中,使用非面部刺激、明确加工范式和/或事件相关设计的研究结果不太一致。这意味着人脸可能传达除基本情绪表达之外的微妙信息(例如可信度)。这也意味着当实验范式认知要求过高以及在缺乏统计效力的研究中,大脑对中性刺激的异常反应性不太可能发生。为解释大脑对中性刺激反应性增加而提出的主要假说是精神病的异常显著性假说。其他研究人员提出,精神分裂症患者大脑对中性刺激的异常反应性源于异常的联想学习、不可信判断、启动效应和/或对中性刺激的习惯化降低。未来,需要确定抗精神病药物对这种异常大脑反应性的影响,以及性别/性别的潜在影响。