• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪刺激的大脑激活中的性别差异:神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。

Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1578-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.011
PMID:22450197
Abstract

Substantial sex differences in emotional responses and perception have been reported in previous psychological and psychophysiological studies. For example, women have been found to respond more strongly to negative emotional stimuli, a sex difference that has been linked to an increased risk of depression and anxiety disorders. The extent to which such sex differences are reflected in corresponding differences in regional brain activation remains a largely unresolved issue, however, in part because relatively few neuroimaging studies have addressed this issue. Here, by conducting a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies, we were able to substantially increase statistical power to detect sex differences relative to prior studies, by combining emotion studies which explicitly examined sex differences with the much larger number of studies that examined only women or men. We used an activation likelihood estimation approach to characterize sex differences in the likelihood of regional brain activation elicited by emotional stimuli relative to non-emotional stimuli. We examined sex differences separately for negative and positive emotions, in addition to examining all emotions combined. Sex differences varied markedly between negative and positive emotion studies. The majority of sex differences favoring women were observed for negative emotion, whereas the majority of the sex differences favoring men were observed for positive emotion. This valence-specificity was particularly evident for the amygdala. For negative emotion, women exhibited greater activation than men in the left amygdala, as well as in other regions including the left thalamus, hypothalamus, mammillary bodies, left caudate, and medial prefrontal cortex. In contrast, for positive emotion, men exhibited greater activation than women in the left amygdala, as well as greater activation in other regions including the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus and right fusiform gyrus. These meta-analysis findings indicate that the amygdala, a key region for emotion processing, exhibits valence-dependent sex differences in activation to emotional stimuli. The greater left amygdala response to negative emotion for women accords with previous reports that women respond more strongly to negative emotional stimuli, as well as with hypothesized links between increased neurobiological reactivity to negative emotion and increased prevalence of depression and anxiety disorders in women. The finding of greater left amygdala activation for positive emotional stimuli in men suggests that greater amygdala responses reported previously for men for specific types of positive stimuli may also extend to positive stimuli more generally. In summary, this study extends efforts to characterize sex differences in brain activation during emotion processing by providing the largest and most comprehensive quantitative meta-analysis to date, and for the first time examining sex differences as a function of positive vs. negative emotional valence. The current findings highlight the importance of considering sex as a potential factor modulating emotional processing and its underlying neural mechanisms, and more broadly, the need to consider individual differences in understanding the neurobiology of emotion.

摘要

先前的心理学和心理生理学研究报告称,在情绪反应和感知方面存在明显的性别差异。例如,女性对负面情绪刺激的反应更为强烈,这种性别差异与抑郁和焦虑障碍的风险增加有关。然而,在区域大脑激活方面,这种性别差异在多大程度上得到反映,仍然是一个尚未解决的主要问题,部分原因是相对较少的神经影像学研究解决了这个问题。在这里,通过对神经影像学研究进行定量荟萃分析,我们能够通过将明确检查性别差异的情绪研究与检查仅女性或男性的大量研究相结合,大大增加检测性别差异的统计能力。我们使用激活似然估计方法来描述情绪刺激相对于非情绪刺激引起的区域大脑激活的性别差异的可能性。我们分别检查了负面和积极情绪的性别差异,以及检查了所有情绪的综合性别差异。性别差异在负面和积极情绪研究之间差异明显。在负面情绪中,大多数有利于女性的性别差异被观察到,而在积极情绪中,大多数有利于男性的性别差异被观察到。这种对效价的特异性在杏仁核中尤为明显。对于负面情绪,女性在左侧杏仁核以及其他区域(包括左侧丘脑、下丘脑、乳头体、左侧尾状核和内侧前额叶皮质)的激活程度高于男性。相比之下,对于积极情绪,男性在左侧杏仁核以及其他区域(包括双侧额下回和右侧梭状回)的激活程度高于女性。这些荟萃分析结果表明,杏仁核作为情绪处理的关键区域,在对情绪刺激的激活方面表现出效价依赖性的性别差异。女性对负面情绪的左杏仁核反应更强,这与女性对负面情绪刺激的反应更强烈的先前报告一致,也与对负面情绪的神经生物学反应增加与女性中抑郁和焦虑障碍的患病率增加之间的假设联系一致。对于积极情绪,男性左杏仁核的激活程度更高,这表明之前为男性报告的特定类型的积极刺激的更大杏仁核反应也可能扩展到更一般的积极刺激。总之,本研究通过提供迄今为止最大和最全面的定量荟萃分析,以及首次检查作为积极与消极情绪效价函数的性别差异,扩展了描述情绪处理过程中大脑激活性别差异的努力。当前的研究结果强调了考虑性别作为调节情绪处理及其潜在神经机制的潜在因素的重要性,更广泛地说,需要考虑个体差异来理解情绪的神经生物学。

相似文献

1
Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.情绪刺激的大脑激活中的性别差异:神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1578-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
2
Neural correlates of positive and negative emotion regulation.积极和消极情绪调节的神经关联
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 May;19(5):776-98. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.776.
3
Gender differences in regional cerebral activity during the perception of emotion: a functional MRI study.情绪感知过程中大脑区域活动的性别差异:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):854-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.053. Epub 2006 May 19.
4
Sex differences in the brain response to affective scenes with or without humans.大脑对有或没有人类的情感场景反应中的性别差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2374-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.030. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
5
Neural correlates of alexithymia: a meta-analysis of emotion processing studies.浅析躯体化障碍的神经关联:情绪处理研究的荟萃分析
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1774-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.杏仁核在情绪加工中的作用:功能神经影像学研究的定量荟萃分析
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(4):811-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
7
Neural correlates of altered general emotion processing in social anxiety disorder.社会焦虑障碍中一般情绪处理改变的神经相关因素。
Brain Res. 2011 Mar 10;1378:72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.084. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
8
Neural interaction of the amygdala with the prefrontal and temporal cortices in the processing of facial expressions as revealed by fMRI.功能磁共振成像揭示杏仁核在面部表情处理中与前额叶和颞叶皮质的神经交互作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Nov 15;13(8):1035-47. doi: 10.1162/089892901753294338.
9
Sex differences in brain activation patterns during processing of positively and negatively valenced emotional words.在处理正性和负性情绪词汇过程中大脑激活模式的性别差异。
Psychol Med. 2007 Jan;37(1):109-19. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008919. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
10
Neural correlates of regulation of positive and negative emotions: an fmri study.正负情绪调节的神经关联:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jun 26;457(2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.094. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental well-being of college students: focus on sex differences and psycho physiological indices.大学生的心理健康:关注性别差异和心理生理指标。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Sep 4;25(1):3038. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24231-9.
2
Global, regional, and national trends in depressive disorder prevalence and DALYs among women of childbearing age from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2040: a comprehensive analysis from 1990 to 2021.1990年至2021年育龄妇女抑郁症患病率和伤残调整生命年的全球、区域和国家趋势及到2040年的预测:1990年至2021年的综合分析
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Aug 18;6:1629747. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1629747. eCollection 2025.
3
Consistent activation differences versus differences in consistent activation: Evaluating meta-analytic contrasts.
一致性激活差异与一致性激活中的差异:评估元分析对比。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Nov 8;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00358. eCollection 2024.
4
Dynamic Inter-Modality Source Coupling Reveals Sex Differences in Children based on Brain Structural-Functional Network Connectivity: A Multimodal MRI Study of the ABCD Dataset.基于脑结构-功能网络连通性的动态跨模态源耦合揭示儿童性别差异:ABCD数据集的多模态MRI研究
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 29:2025.07.23.666366. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.23.666366.
5
Utilizing Tympanic Membrane Temperature for Earphone-Based Emotion Recognition.利用鼓膜温度进行基于耳机的情绪识别。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;25(14):4411. doi: 10.3390/s25144411.
6
Affect-elicited N1 and P3b Effects Under Attentional Demands: Event-related Potentials-based Mass-univariate Analysis in Young Adolescents with Gender Implications.注意力需求下情感诱发的N1和P3b效应:基于事件相关电位的青少年性别差异单变量分析
Ann Neurosci. 2025 Jul 4:09727531251346432. doi: 10.1177/09727531251346432.
7
Merkel cell stimulation in fear and sensory signaling.恐惧和感觉信号传导中的默克尔细胞刺激
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02144-w.
8
Two paradoxes in women's well-being.女性幸福中的两个悖论。
Sci Adv. 2025 Mar 7;11(10):eadt1646. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt1646. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
9
Bridging Neuroscience and Machine Learning: A Gender-Based Electroencephalogram Framework for Guilt Emotion Identification.连接神经科学与机器学习:一个基于性别的用于内疚情绪识别的脑电图框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 17;25(4):1222. doi: 10.3390/s25041222.
10
A comparative study of EEG microstate dynamics during happy and sad music videos.快乐和悲伤音乐视频期间脑电图微状态动力学的比较研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Feb 6;18:1469468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1469468. eCollection 2024.