Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛患者的目标追求:个人项目分析

Goal Pursuit in Individuals with Chronic Pain: A Personal Project Analysis.

作者信息

Crombez Geert, Lauwerier Emelien, Goubert Liesbet, Van Damme Stefaan

机构信息

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent UniversityGent, Belgium; Center for Pain Research, University of BathBath, UK.

Department of Health and Well-being, University Colleges Leuven-Limburg Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 28;7:966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00966. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In individuals with chronic pain (ICPs), controlling pain often is a salient goal, despite the difficulty to achieve it. This situation may bring along frustration and distress. Yet much remains unknown about the content, appraisal, and structure of goals that ICPs pursue. Here, we explore these goals, and specifically focus upon possible differences and interrelations between pain control goals (e.g., "to control my pain") and non-pain goals (e.g., "to go to work").

DESIGN AND METHODS

"Personal Project Analysis" was used in 73 ICPs (48 females; 25 males; M age = 49.85 years; SD = 9.72) to elicit goals and goal appraisals. Interrelations between pain and non-pain goals, namely interference (i.e., negative influence), facilitation (i.e., positive influence), and necessary condition (i.e., conditional relation between pain control goal and non-pain goals) were measured with three items. Self-report measures of pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, problem solving and acceptance were completed.

RESULTS

Participants reported a variety of goals. Appraisals of pain control goals were less favorable than appraisals of non-pain goals. ICPs with higher acceptance and meaningfulness of life reported more control over pain goals, and more progress in reaching pain control goals. These individuals also reported an overall much more positive appraisal of non-pain goals (i.e., less stress, difficulty, more progress, control). In contrast, high catastrophizing and the need to solve pain were negatively related to goal appraisals. Importantly, ICP's with high perceived meaningfulness of life despite pain experienced less necessity to achieve pain control goals in order to achieve non-pain goals. This was opposite for individuals with high levels of catastrophizing.

DISCUSSION

An understanding of why ICPs may become stuck in attempts to control their pain does not only require an understanding of how individuals appraise their pain, but also requires an understanding of how pain and non-pain goals interrelate. In particular, the view that controlling pain is necessary in order to be able to achieve other goals seems detrimental.

摘要

目的

在慢性疼痛患者中,尽管难以实现,但控制疼痛往往是一个突出的目标。这种情况可能会带来挫折感和痛苦。然而,对于慢性疼痛患者所追求目标的内容、评估和结构,仍有许多未知之处。在此,我们探讨这些目标,并特别关注疼痛控制目标(如“控制我的疼痛”)和非疼痛目标(如“去工作”)之间可能存在的差异和相互关系。

设计与方法

对73名慢性疼痛患者(48名女性;25名男性;平均年龄 = 49.85岁;标准差 = 9.72)采用“个人项目分析”来引出目标和目标评估。用三个项目测量疼痛和非疼痛目标之间的相互关系,即干扰(即负面影响)、促进(即正面影响)和必要条件(即疼痛控制目标与非疼痛目标之间的条件关系)。完成了疼痛强度、疼痛灾难化、问题解决和接纳程度的自我报告测量。

结果

参与者报告了各种各样的目标。对疼痛控制目标的评估不如对非疼痛目标的评估有利。生活接纳度和意义感较高的慢性疼痛患者报告对疼痛目标有更多的控制,并且在实现疼痛控制目标方面有更多进展。这些个体还报告对非疼痛目标的总体评估要积极得多(即压力更小、困难更少、进展更多、控制更多)。相比之下,高灾难化程度和解决疼痛的需求与目标评估呈负相关。重要的是,尽管疼痛但生活意义感较高的慢性疼痛患者认为为了实现非疼痛目标而实现疼痛控制目标的必要性较低。对于灾难化程度高的个体则相反。

讨论

理解慢性疼痛患者为何可能在控制疼痛的尝试中陷入困境,不仅需要理解个体如何评估他们的疼痛,还需要理解疼痛和非疼痛目标是如何相互关联的。特别是,认为控制疼痛是实现其他目标的必要条件这一观点似乎是有害的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
9
Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health.心理灵活性是健康的基本方面。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):865-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
10
Coping with pain: a motivational perspective.应对疼痛:一种动机视角。
Pain. 2008 Sep 30;139(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.022. Epub 2008 Aug 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验