Amundsen Olav, Vøllestad Nina Køpke, Meisingset Ingebrigt, Robinson Hilde Stendal
Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P. O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 13;22(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04048-4.
Goal setting is linked to person-centred care and is a core component in physiotherapy, but the associations between goal classes, patient characteristics and outcome measures for musculoskeletal disorders has not been investigated. The study's purpose was to examine 1) how goals used in clinical practice for patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are distributed in classes based on ICF, 2) if goal classes were associated with patient characteristics and 3) whether goal classes were associated with treatment outcome.
Data analysis from a longitudinal observational study (N = 2591). Goals were classified in symptom, function/structure, activity/participation and non-classifiable. Associations between patient characteristics and goal classes were examined using x and one-way ANOVA. Association between goal classes and outcomes were examined using multiple logistic and linear regression models. Outcomes are reported at 3 months or end of treatment if prior to 3 months.
There was a high variability in goals used for patients with MSD. 17% had symptom goals, 32.3% function/structure, 43.4% activity/participation and 7.4% non-classifiable goals. We found significant associations between goal classes and age, gender, severity, region of pain/diagnosis and emotional distress (all p < .001). Activity/participation goals were associated with better outcomes on GPE (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.66). Non-classifiable goal was associated with poorer outcomes on pain intensity (B .87, 95% CI .32-1.43).
There is an association between goal classes and patient characteristics. Including activity/participation in the main goal was associated with better outcomes for GPE and having a non-classifiable goal was associated with poorer outcomes for pain intensity.
The project is approved by the Regional committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway (REC no. 2013/2030). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03626389 .
目标设定与以患者为中心的护理相关联,是物理治疗的核心组成部分,但肌肉骨骼疾病的目标类别、患者特征和结局指标之间的关联尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是探讨:1)临床实践中用于肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)患者的目标如何根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)进行分类;2)目标类别是否与患者特征相关;3)目标类别是否与治疗结局相关。
对一项纵向观察性研究(N = 2591)进行数据分析。目标分为症状、功能/结构、活动/参与和不可分类四类。使用卡方检验和单因素方差分析来检验患者特征与目标类别之间的关联。使用多元逻辑回归和线性回归模型来检验目标类别与结局之间的关联。如果在3个月之前结束治疗,则在3个月或治疗结束时报告结局。
用于MSD患者的目标存在很大差异。17%的患者有症状目标,32.3%有功能/结构目标,43.4%有活动/参与目标,7.4%有不可分类目标。我们发现目标类别与年龄、性别、严重程度、疼痛部位/诊断和情绪困扰之间存在显著关联(所有p <.001)。活动/参与目标与总体疼痛评价(GPE)的更好结局相关(优势比1.80,95%置信区间1.23 - 2.66)。不可分类目标与疼痛强度的较差结局相关(B值为0.87,95%置信区间0.32 - 1.43)。
目标类别与患者特征之间存在关联。将活动/参与纳入主要目标与GPE的更好结局相关,而有不可分类目标与疼痛强度的较差结局相关。
该项目已获得挪威医学和健康研究伦理区域委员会的批准(伦理委员会编号:2013/2030)。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03626389 。