Upadhyaya Arun, Hu Tianpeng, Meng Zhaowei, Li Xue, He Xianghui, Tian Weijun, Jia Qiang, Tan Jian
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Heping, Tianjin 300052, P.R. China.
Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Heping, Tianjin 300052, P.R. China.
Biomed Rep. 2016 Aug;5(2):221-227. doi: 10.3892/br.2016.691. Epub 2016 May 26.
Harmonic scalpel and LigaSure vessel sealing systems have been suggested as options for saving surgical time and reducing postoperative complications. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to compare surgical time, postoperative complications and other parameters between them in for the open thyroidectomy procedure. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science until December 2015. All the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Harmonic scalpel and LigaSure during open thyroidectomy were selected. Following data extraction, statistical analyses were performed. Among the 24 studies that were evaluated for eligibility, 7 RCTs with 981 patients were included. The Harmonic scalpel significantly reduced surgical time compared with LigaSure techniques (8.79 min; 95% confidence interval, -15.91 to -1.67; P=0.02). However, no significant difference was observed for the intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, thyroid weight and serum calcium level postoperatively in either group. The present meta-analysis indicated superiority of Harmonic Scalpel only in terms of surgical time compared with LigaSure hemostasis techniques in open thyroid surgery.
谐波手术刀和LigaSure血管闭合系统被认为是节省手术时间和减少术后并发症的选择。本荟萃分析的目的是比较它们在开放性甲状腺切除术中的手术时间、术后并发症及其他参数。从MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE和ISI科学网检索截至2015年12月的研究。选择了所有在开放性甲状腺切除术中比较谐波手术刀和LigaSure的随机对照试验(RCT)。在进行数据提取后,进行了统计分析。在评估是否符合条件的24项研究中,纳入了7项RCT,共981例患者。与LigaSure技术相比,谐波手术刀显著缩短了手术时间(8.79分钟;95%置信区间,-15.91至-1.67;P=0.02)。然而,两组在术中出血量、术后出血量、住院时间、甲状腺重量和术后血清钙水平方面均未观察到显著差异。本荟萃分析表明,在开放性甲状腺手术中,与LigaSure止血技术相比,谐波手术刀仅在手术时间方面具有优势。