• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查报告质量的综述。

A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:9423142. doi: 10.1155/2016/9423142. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1155/2016/9423142
PMID:27446877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4904656/
Abstract

Colonoscopy reports are important communication tools for providers and patients with potential to serve as information sources for research, quality, performance, and resource management. Despite decades of work, studies continue to indicate that colonoscopy reports are often incomplete. Although electronic medical records (EMRs) and databases can address this problem, costs, workflow, and interoperability (difficulty exchanging information between systems) continue to limit adoption and implementation of endoscopy EMRs in Canada and elsewhere. Quality and reporting guidelines alone have proven to be insufficient. In this review we have derived and applied five key themes to challenges in the current state of colonoscopy reporting and propose strategies to address them.

摘要

结肠镜检查报告是医生和患者之间进行有效沟通的重要工具,它也有可能成为研究、质量、绩效和资源管理的信息来源。尽管已经进行了几十年的研究,但研究仍表明,结肠镜检查报告往往不够完整。尽管电子病历(EMR)和数据库可以解决这个问题,但成本、工作流程和互操作性(在系统之间交换信息的难度)继续限制了加拿大和其他地方内窥镜 EMR 的采用和实施。仅靠质量和报告指南已被证明是不够的。在本综述中,我们针对当前结肠镜检查报告的挑战,推导出并应用了五个关键主题,并提出了应对这些挑战的策略。

相似文献

1
A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting.结肠镜检查报告质量的综述。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:9423142. doi: 10.1155/2016/9423142. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
2
Hospices' use of electronic medical records for quality assessment and performance improvement programs.临终关怀机构在质量评估和绩效改进项目中对电子病历的使用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
3
Quality assurance for endoscopists.内镜医师的质量保证。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun;25(3):349-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.05.003.
4
Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.结直肠镜报告质量和日常临床实践中结直肠镜性能的评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.032. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
5
Quality assurance as an integrated part of the electronic medical record - a prototype applied for colonoscopy.质量保证作为电子病历的一个组成部分——一项应用于结肠镜检查的原型。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(10):1259-65. doi: 10.1080/00365520903132021.
6
Challenges in data quality assurance for electronic health records.电子健康记录数据质量保证中的挑战。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:37-41.
7
The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality.利用数据库和登记系统提高结肠镜检查质量。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Oct;20(4):717-34. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
8
Brief review: Adoption of electronic medical records to enhance acute pain management.简要回顾:采用电子病历以加强急性疼痛管理。
Can J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;61(2):164-79. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-0069-6.
9
Implementing standards for the interoperability among healthcare providers in the public regionalized Healthcare Information System of the Lombardy Region.在伦巴第地区公共区域化医疗保健信息系统中实施医疗服务提供者之间互操作性的标准。
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Aug;45(4):736-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
10
Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.标准化结肠镜检查报告与数据系统:美国国家结直肠癌圆桌会议质量保证任务组报告
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 May;65(6):757-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.055.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing and Not Replacing Clinical Expertise: Improving Named-Entity Recognition in Colonoscopy Reports Through Mixed Real-Synthetic Training Sources.增强而非取代临床专业知识:通过混合真实与合成训练源提高结肠镜检查报告中的命名实体识别
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 30;15(8):334. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080334.
2
Using a Mobile Health App (ColonClean) to Enhance the Effectiveness of Bowel Preparation: Development and Usability Study.使用移动健康应用程序(ColonClean)提高肠道准备效果:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 8;12:e58479. doi: 10.2196/58479.
3
Gaps and improvement opportunities in post-colonoscopy communication.结肠镜检查后沟通中的差距与改进机会。
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;26(1):90-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
4
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Software Analysis of Colonoscopy Videos Enhances Teaching and Quality Metrics.结肠镜检查视频的软件分析提升教学与质量指标。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 10;14(3):e23039. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23039. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Development of a definition and rules for causal attribution of post-colonoscopy bleeding.开发结肠镜检查后出血因果归因的定义和规则。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0235902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235902. eCollection 2020.
7
Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查用肠道准备质量评分量表。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 14;24(26):2833-2843. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2833.
8
Quality in Colonoscopy: Beyond the Adenoma Detection Rate Fever.结肠镜检查的质量:超越腺瘤检出率热。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;24(5):211-218. doi: 10.1159/000478940. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
State disparities in colorectal cancer rates: Contributions of risk factors, screening, and survival differences.结直肠癌发病率的州际差异:风险因素、筛查及生存差异的作用
Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;121(20):3676-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29561. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
2
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
3
Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy quality indicators: a report from the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group.结肠镜检查质量指标的纵向评估:胃肠病学实践管理小组的报告
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Nov;80(5):835-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.1043. Epub 2014 May 10.
4
Practice and documentation of performance of colonoscopy in a central Canadian health region.加拿大中部一个卫生区域结肠镜检查操作的实践和记录。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;28(4):185-90. doi: 10.1155/2014/635932.
5
Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.波士顿肠道准备量表评分提供了一个用于描述肠道清洁程度是否足够的标准化定义。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
6
Validity of a Web-based educational program to disseminate a standardized bowel preparation rating scale.一个基于网络的教育项目用于传播标准化肠道准备评分量表的有效性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov-Dec;48(10):856-61. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000028.
7
Validation of a new bowel preparation scale for measuring colon cleansing for colonoscopy: the chicago bowel preparation scale.验证一种新的用于评估结肠镜检查前结肠清洁度的肠道准备量表:芝加哥肠道准备量表。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 5;4(12):e43. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2013.16.
8
Colonoscopy audit over 10 years--what can be learnt?十年的结肠镜检查审计——能学到什么?
N Z Med J. 2013 Sep 13;126(1382):25-35.
9
Colonoscopy quality improvement: practice to public health.结肠镜检查质量改进:从实践到公共卫生
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Dec;78(6):919-924. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.051. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
10
Colonoscopy quality: metrics and implementation.结肠镜检查质量:指标和实施。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;42(3):599-618. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.005.