Seidel H, Richter J, Kurerov N N, Schajpak E J, Blüthner R, Erdmann U, Hinz B
Central Institute for Occupational Medicine, Berlin, German Democratic Republic.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1989;61(6):413-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00381034.
Nine healthy sitting males evaluated the intensity of vertical whole-body vibration (WBV) in z-axis at four frequencies (F1 = 0.63 Hz, F2 = 1.25 Hz, F3 = 2.5 Hz, F4 = 5 Hz) and two intensities (I1 = 1 ms-2 rms, I2 = 2 ms-2 rms) by cross-modality matching (CMM). The subjects were simultaneously exposed to low-frequency noise at two levels (L1 = 65 dBA, L2 = 86 dBA). L1 and L2 were context conditions which did not have to be evaluated by CMM. The results indicate a flat response between F2 and F3; the sensitivity increases towards F1. Different exponents of Stevens' power law for the frequencies of WBV contradict the frequency range tested to be a sensory continuum. L2 caused practically significantly stronger sensations of the WBV-intensity from F1 to F3 (I1) and at F2 (I2). No synergistic effect of noise and WBV was shown at F3I2. Weighting factors were calculated for all exposure conditions using Stevens' power law. The weighting of F2 and F3 contradicts that of the International Standard ISO 2631-1985 (E). The results enable recommendations for the frequency weighting of WBV between 0.63 and 1 Hz, as well as for the equivalence of noise and WBV with combined exposure.
九名健康的男性受试者以坐姿,通过交叉模态匹配(CMM)评估了z轴方向上垂直全身振动(WBV)在四个频率(F1 = 0.63赫兹,F2 = 1.25赫兹,F3 = 2.5赫兹,F4 = 5赫兹)和两种强度(I1 = 1米每二次方秒均方根,I2 = 2米每二次方秒均方根)下的强度。受试者同时暴露于两种强度水平的低频噪声(L1 = 65分贝A,L2 = 86分贝A)中。L1和L2是无需通过CMM进行评估的背景条件。结果表明,在F2和F3之间响应呈平缓状态;对F1的敏感度增加。针对WBV频率的史蒂文斯幂定律的不同指数与测试的频率范围为感觉连续体这一观点相矛盾。L2实际上使从F1到F3(I1)以及F2(I2)的WBV强度感觉明显增强。在F3I2时未显示出噪声和WBV的协同效应。使用史蒂文斯幂定律计算了所有暴露条件下的加权因子。F2和F3的加权与国际标准ISO 2631 - 1985(E)的加权相矛盾。这些结果为0.63至1赫兹之间的WBV频率加权以及噪声与WBV联合暴露的等效性提供了建议。