Physician Assistant Program, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 800 South Duke Street, Durham, NC 27701, United States.
Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, United States.
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec;4(4):327-333. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
Team-based care involving physician assistants (PAs) and advance practice nurses (APNs) is one strategy for improving access and quality of care. PA/APNs perform a variety of roles on primary care teams. However, limited research describes the relationship between PA/APN role and patient outcomes. We examined multiple outcomes associated with primary care PA/APN roles.
In this cross-sectional survey analysis, we studied adult respondents to the 2010 Health Tracking Household Survey. Outcomes included primary care and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, unmet need, and satisfaction. PA/APN role was categorized as physician only (no PA/APN visits; reference), usual provider (PA/APN provide majority of primary care visits) or supplemental provider (physician as usual provider, PA/APN provide a subset of visits). Multivariable logistic and multinomial logistic regressions were performed.
Compared to people with physician only care, patients with PA/APNs as usual providers [5-9 visits RRR=2.4 (CI 1.8-3.4), 10+ visits RRR=3.0 (CI 2.0-4.5): reference 2-4 visits] and supplemental providers had increased risk of having 5 or more primary care visits [5-9 visits RRR=1.3 (CI 1.0-1.6)]. Patients reporting PA/APN as supplemental providers had increased risk of emergency department utilization [2+ visits: RRR 1.8 (CI 1.3, 2.5)], and lower satisfaction [very dissatisfied: RRR 1.8 (CI 1.03-3.0)]. No differences were seen for hospitalizations or unmet need.
Healthcare utilization patterns and satisfaction varied between adults with PA/APN in different roles, but reported unmet need did not. These findings suggest a wide range of outcomes should be considered when identifying the best PA/APN role on primary care teams.
以医师助理(PA)和高级执业护士(APN)为基础的团队护理是改善医疗服务可及性和质量的策略之一。PA/APN 在初级保健团队中扮演着多种角色。然而,关于 PA/APN 角色与患者结局之间的关系,相关研究十分有限。我们研究了与初级保健 PA/APN 角色相关的多种结局。
本横断面调查分析研究对象为 2010 年健康追踪家庭调查的成年受访者。结局包括初级保健和急诊就诊、住院、未满足的医疗需求和满意度。PA/APN 角色分为仅医师(无 PA/APN 就诊;参照组)、常规提供者(PA/APN 提供大部分初级保健就诊)或补充提供者(常规医师,PA/APN 提供部分就诊)。采用多变量逻辑回归和多项逻辑回归进行分析。
与仅接受医师治疗的患者相比,接受 PA/APN 常规提供者治疗的患者(就诊 5-9 次的 RR 为 2.4(95%CI 1.8-3.4),就诊 10 次及以上的 RR 为 3.0(95%CI 2.0-4.5):参照组就诊 2-4 次)和补充提供者治疗的患者,有更多的可能性就诊 5 次或更多次[就诊 5-9 次的 RR 为 1.3(95%CI 1.0-1.6)]。报告 PA/APN 为补充提供者的患者,有更多的急诊就诊需求[就诊 2 次及以上的 RR 为 1.8(95%CI 1.3-2.5)],满意度更低[非常不满意的 RR 为 1.8(95%CI 1.03-3.0)]。在住院或未满足的医疗需求方面,两组之间无差异。
在不同角色的 PA/APN 成人中,医疗服务利用模式和满意度存在差异,但报告的未满足的医疗需求无差异。这些发现表明,在确定初级保健团队中最佳的 PA/APN 角色时,应考虑多种结局。