Jaya Edo S, Ascone Leonie, Lincoln Tania M
Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Schizophr Bull. 2017 May 1;43(3):557-565. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw104.
Social adversity is a risk factor for psychosis, but the translating mechanisms are not well understood. This study tests whether the relationship between social adversity and psychosis is mediated by cognitive vulnerability in the form of low perceived social rank, negative schemas related to self and other, and loneliness and whether the putative mediations are specific to psychosis or are largely explained by depression.
The study was a survey in a community sample (N = 2350) from Germany (n = 786), Indonesia (n = 844), and the United States (n = 720). Mediation path analysis with structural equation modeling was used to test for the specificity of the hypothesized paths to psychosis controlling for depression.
Social adversity had a significant medium to large effect on positive (R2 = .20) and negative symptoms (R2 = .38). Social rank, negative schemas, and loneliness significantly mediated the relationship between social adversity and negative symptoms and the models explained a large amount of the variance (R2 = .43-.44). For positive symptoms, only negative schemas were a significant mediator (R2 = .27).
The results emphasize the role of social adversity in psychosis and support the assumption that cognitive vulnerability is a relevant translating mechanism as postulated by the social defeat hypothesis and cognitive models of psychosis. This underlines the relevance of the clinical practice of targeting beliefs in cognitive interventions for psychosis. It also indicates that targeting cognitive vulnerability in people experiencing social adversity could be a promising approach to prevention.
社会逆境是精神病的一个风险因素,但其转化机制尚不清楚。本研究检验社会逆境与精神病之间的关系是否由认知易损性介导,这种认知易损性表现为低社会地位感知、与自我和他人相关的消极图式以及孤独感,以及假定的中介作用是否特定于精神病,还是很大程度上由抑郁症来解释。
该研究是对来自德国(n = 786)、印度尼西亚(n = 844)和美国(n = 720)的社区样本(N = 2350)进行的一项调查。采用结构方程模型的中介路径分析来检验控制抑郁症后假设路径对精神病的特异性。
社会逆境对阳性症状(R2 = 0.20)和阴性症状(R2 = 0.38)有显著的中等到较大影响。社会地位、消极图式和孤独感显著介导了社会逆境与阴性症状之间的关系,这些模型解释了很大一部分方差(R2 = 0.43 - 0.44)。对于阳性症状,只有消极图式是显著的中介因素(R2 = 0.27)。
结果强调了社会逆境在精神病中的作用,并支持了认知易损性是社会失败假说和精神病认知模型所假设的相关转化机制这一假设。这突出了在精神病认知干预中针对信念的临床实践的相关性。这也表明,针对经历社会逆境的人的认知易损性可能是一种有前景的预防方法。