Srinivasan Sudha M, Eigsti Inge-Marie, Neelly Linda, Bhat Anjana N
Department of Physical Therapy, Biomechanics and Movement Sciences Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2016 Jul;27:54-72. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2016.01.004.
We compared the effects of 8-weeks of rhythm and robotic interventions with those of a comparison, standard-of-care intervention, on the spontaneous and responsive social attention patterns of school-age children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Attention patterns were examined within a standardized pretest/posttest measure of joint attention (JA) and a training-specific social attention measure during early, mid, and late training sessions. The rhythm and comparison groups demonstrated improvements in JA. Social attention was greater in the rhythm followed by the robot and lastly the comparison group. The robot and comparison groups spent maximum time fixating on the robot and objects, respectively. Across sessions, the robot group decreased attention to the robot and increased attention to elsewhere. Overall, rhythmic movement contexts afford sustained social monitoring in children with autism.
我们比较了为期8周的节奏和机器人干预与对照的标准护理干预对自闭症谱系障碍学龄儿童自发和反应性社会注意模式的影响。在标准化的联合注意(JA)前测/后测测量以及早期、中期和后期训练阶段的特定训练社会注意测量中检查注意模式。节奏组和对照组在JA方面均有改善。节奏组的社会注意程度最高,其次是机器人组,最后是对照组。机器人组和对照组分别将最长时间用于注视机器人和物体。在各个训练阶段,机器人组减少了对机器人的注意,并增加了对其他地方的注意。总体而言,有节奏的运动环境能使自闭症儿童进行持续的社会监测。