Cao Wei, Song Wenxu, Li Xinge, Zheng Sixiao, Zhang Ge, Wu Yanting, He Sailing, Zhu Huilin, Chen Jiajia
Centre for Optical and Electromagnetic Research, South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 5;10:1503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01503. eCollection 2019.
It is widely recognized that robot-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) hold promise, but the question remains as to whether social humanoid robots could facilitate joint attention performance in children with ASD. In this study, responsive joint attention was measured under two conditions in which different agents, a human and a robot, initiated joint attention via video. The participants were 15 children with ASD (mean age: 4.96 ± 1.10 years) and 15 typically developing (TD) children (mean age: 4.53 ± 0.90 years). In addition to analyses of fixation time and gaze transitions, a longest common subsequence approach (LCS) was employed to compare participants' eye movements to a predefined logical reference sequence. The fixation of TD toward agent's face was earlier and longer than children with ASD. Moreover, TD showed a greater number of gaze transitions between agent's face and target, and higher LCS scores than children with ASD. Both groups showed more interests in the robot's face, but the robot induced a lower proportion of fixation time on the target. Meanwhile participants showed similar gaze transitions and LCS results in both conditions, suggesting that they could follow the logic of the joint attention task induced by the robot as well as human. We have discussed the implications for the effects and applications of social humanoid robots in joint attention interventions.
人们普遍认为,基于机器人的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)干预措施具有前景,但社交类人机器人是否能促进ASD儿童的共同注意力表现仍是个问题。在本研究中,在两种条件下测量了反应性共同注意力,其中不同的主体,即人类和机器人,通过视频发起共同注意力。参与者为15名ASD儿童(平均年龄:4.96±1.10岁)和15名发育正常(TD)儿童(平均年龄:4.53±0.90岁)。除了分析注视时间和目光转移外,还采用了最长公共子序列方法(LCS)将参与者的眼动与预定义的逻辑参考序列进行比较。TD儿童对主体面部的注视更早且持续时间更长,比ASD儿童长。此外,TD儿童在主体面部和目标之间的目光转移次数更多,LCS得分也高于ASD儿童。两组对机器人面部都表现出更多兴趣,但机器人引起的对目标的注视时间比例较低。同时,参与者在两种条件下的目光转移和LCS结果相似,这表明他们能够像跟随人类一样跟随机器人引发的共同注意力任务的逻辑。我们已经讨论了社交类人机器人在共同注意力干预中的效果和应用的意义。