Hembree J H, George T A, Hembree M E
J Prosthet Dent. 1978 May;39(5):533-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(78)80188-7.
The results showed that Durelon, EBAC, zinc phosphate, Epoxylite CBA, and Fynal had thinner film thicknesses than EBA and Fluro-Thin. In addition, venting of a crown resulted in lower film thicknesses with all cements except Fynal and EBAC. No significant differences occurred with these two cements whether the crown was vented or not. Obviously many other factors besides film thickness, such as toxicity, strength, and solubility, have to be considered before selecting a cement for clinical use. When only film thickness is to be considered, all of the cements in the study could be recommended for the cementation of crowns with the exception of EBA and Fluoro-Thin.
结果显示，Durelon、EBAC、磷酸锌、Epoxylite CBA和Fynal的薄膜厚度比EBA和氟化物薄膜更薄。此外，除Fynal和EBAC外，所有粘固剂在冠部通气时薄膜厚度更低。这两种粘固剂在冠部通气与否的情况下均无显著差异。显然，在选择临床使用的粘固剂之前，除薄膜厚度外，还必须考虑许多其他因素，如毒性、强度和溶解性。当仅考虑薄膜厚度时，本研究中的所有粘固剂，除EBA和氟化物薄膜外，均可推荐用于冠修复体的粘固。
