• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统与现代粘结水门汀:综述

Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview.

作者信息

Ladha Komal, Verma Mahesh

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Jun;10(2):79-88. doi: 10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0. Epub 2010 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0
PMID:21629449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3081255/
Abstract

Long-term clinical success of fixed prosthodontic restorations is influenced by many factors, one important factor being the selection of an appropriate luting agent. No single luting agent is capable of meeting all the stringent requirements, which is one reason why there is such a wide choice of luting agents currently available from conventional water-based to contemporary adhesive resin cements. Introduction of adhesive resin systems has completely changed the face of fixed prosthodontic practice leading to an increased use of bonded all-ceramic crowns and resin-retained fixed partial dentures. This article makes an effort to review various conventional and contemporary luting agents, their properties & associated clinical implications thereby trying to help the clinician select an appropriate luting agent for a given clinical situation.

摘要

固定义齿修复的长期临床成功受到多种因素的影响,其中一个重要因素是选择合适的粘结剂。没有一种粘结剂能够满足所有严格的要求,这就是为什么目前有如此广泛的粘结剂可供选择,从传统的水基粘结剂到现代的粘结树脂水门汀。粘结树脂系统的引入彻底改变了固定义齿修复的面貌,导致粘结全瓷冠和树脂固位固定局部义齿的使用增加。本文致力于综述各种传统和现代粘结剂、它们的性能及相关临床意义,从而帮助临床医生为特定临床情况选择合适的粘结剂。

相似文献

1
Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview.传统与现代粘结水门汀:综述
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Jun;10(2):79-88. doi: 10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
2
Selection of luting agents, part 1.粘结剂的选择,第1部分。
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006 Feb;34(2):149-60.
3
Considerations for the selection of a luting cement.
Dent Update. 2010 May;37(4):247-8, 251-2, 255-6 passim. doi: 10.12968/denu.2010.37.4.247.
4
Bonding all-ceramic restorations with two resins cement techniques: a clinical report of three-year follow-up.采用两种树脂粘结技术粘结全瓷修复体:三年随访临床报告
Eur J Dent. 2011 Aug;5(4):478-85.
5
Retention of metal-ceramic crowns with contemporary dental cements.使用当代牙科粘结剂对金属烤瓷冠的固位
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Sep;140(9):1125-36. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0340.
6
In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.使用不同粘结剂的氧化锆陶瓷冠的体外固位强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011.
7
In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements.三种树脂及传统粘结水门汀的体外溶解性
J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Apr;25(4):285-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00228.x.
8
Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature.牙科黏固剂:当前文献综述
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Sep;80(3):280-301. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70128-3.
9
Adhesive luting cements--classes, criteria, and usage.粘结水门汀——分类、标准及应用。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996 Aug;17(8):759-62, 764 passim; quiz 774.
10
Influence of inorganic filler content of resin luting agents and use of adhesive on the performance of bonded ceramic.树脂水门汀无机填料含量和黏结剂使用对黏结陶瓷性能的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Dec;122(6):566.e1-566.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of Pediatric BioFlx Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crowns Using Different Types of Luting Cements: An In Vitro Study.使用不同类型黏固剂时儿童BioFlx冠与不锈钢冠的固位情况:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;18(6):1287. doi: 10.3390/ma18061287.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Strength, Marginal Adaptation, and Microleakage of Dental Cements in Prosthodontics: An In Vitro Comparative Study.口腔修复学中牙科水门汀粘结强度、边缘适应性及微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):e65534. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65534. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Comparison of retention of cast crown luted with glass ionomer cement in presence of two different types of desensitizer agent on extracted teeth-an in vitro study.在拔除牙上使用两种不同类型脱敏剂时,玻璃离子水门汀粘结铸造冠的固位情况比较——一项体外研究
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 6;10(3):e25891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25891. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
4
Comparison of the fracture strengths of single-unit metal-ceramic and monolithic zirconium restorations in the molar region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磨牙区单单位金属陶瓷和整体氧化锆修复体的骨折强度比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Odontology. 2024 Jul;112(3):751-760. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00878-x. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
5
Knowledge of Saudi dental students and interns towards luting cements and their applications in fixed prosthodontics.沙特牙科学生和实习医生对水门汀的认知及其在固定修复中的应用。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 29;23(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03054-3.
6
Comparison and evaluation of the effect of polymerization of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and dual-cure resin cement on the crystalline structure of dentin using synchrotron X-ray diffraction and its clinical correlation with postoperative sensitivity.使用同步辐射 X 射线衍射对比评价树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和双固化树脂水门汀聚合对牙本质晶体结构的影响及其与术后敏感性的临床相关性。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Apr-Jun;23(2):119-126. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_84_22.
7
Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.牙科水门汀:最新全面综述。
Molecules. 2023 Feb 8;28(4):1619. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041619.
8
Update on Dental Luting Materials.牙科粘结材料的最新进展
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;10(11):208. doi: 10.3390/dj10110208.
9
Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts.不同类型根管桩的粘结剂选择标准。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Jul 18;19:51. eCollection 2022.
10
Evaluation of microhardness and water sorption/solubility of dual-cure resin cement through monolithic zirconia in different shades.不同遮色瓷单块氧化锆对双固化树脂水门汀的显微硬度和水吸附/溶解度的评价。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jan-Mar;21(1):50-56. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_284_20.

本文引用的文献

1
An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various luting agents and tensile loading.使用各种粘结剂和拉伸加载对铸造金属桩核固位进行的体外比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 May;93(5):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.001.
2
Chemical characterization of in vivo aged zinc polycarboxylate dental cements.体内老化的聚羧酸锌牙科水门汀的化学特性
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1998 Sep;9(9):493-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1008879603360.
3
The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.一种树脂基封闭剂对三种粘结剂粘结牙冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 May;91(5):428-35. doi: 10.1016/S0022391304000770.
4
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CEMENTS, BASED ON ZINC OXIDE, HYDROGENATED ROSIN, O-ETHOXYBENZOIC ACID, AND EUGENOL.基于氧化锌、氢化松香、邻乙氧基苯甲酸和丁香酚的水泥物理性能
J Dent Res. 1964 Mar-Apr;43:281-99. doi: 10.1177/00220345640430021701.
5
Improved zinc oxide-eugenol type cements.改良型氧化锌丁香酚类水门汀。
J Dent Res. 1962 Sep-Oct;41:1096-102. doi: 10.1177/00220345620410051201.
6
Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations.用于牙齿修复的二氧化硅增强聚合物的性能
J Am Dent Assoc. 1963 Jan;66:57-64. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1963.0010.
7
The efficacy of luting all-ceramic crowns with resin-modified glass ionomer cement.用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结全瓷冠的疗效。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 May;134(5):609-12; quiz 632-3. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0228.
8
Biofilm: a new view of plaque.生物膜:菌斑的新视角。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2000 Aug 15;1(3):18-29.
9
Fluoride release of glass ionomer-based luting cements in vitro.玻璃离子水门汀类粘结剂的体外氟释放
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Aug;82(2):172-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70152-6.
10
Mechanical properties of dental luting cements.牙科粘结水门汀的力学性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 May;81(5):597-609. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70216-7.