• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

益处发现量表(BFS)在中国早期癌症患者中的应用与评价

Application and evaluation of Benefit Finding Scale (BFS) in early-stage cancer patients from China.

作者信息

Liu Zhunzhun, Gudenkauf Lisa, Zhang Lanfeng, Wang Zunhui

机构信息

Departments of Nursing, Jiangsu Jiangyin People's Hospital, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables 33124-0751, FL, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Aug;23:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2016.04.005
PMID:27456380
Abstract

PURPOSE

To adapt the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS) from English to a Chinese version after considering cross-cultural influences, to validate the tool for assessing benefit in Chinese-speaking patients with early-stage cancer, and to analyze the relationships between BF and sociodemographic and disease-related variables.

METHODS

In part I of the study, the Chinese BFS was adapted from the English version by developing guidelines after due consideration for cross-cultural influences. The translation validity index was used for assessing the quality of translation, and further refining was carried out by administering the scale on early-stage cancer patients (N1 = 200, N2 = 351) in part II and III. The Chinese version of the BFS was analyzed for reliability, dimensionality and construct validity. Relationships between BF and sociodemographic and disease-related variables were analyzed by ANOVA and regression models.

RESULTS

The Chinese BFS was received favorably by patients during the preliminary testing. Cronbach's alpha and interclass correlation coefficients exceeded 0.7, and factor analysis yielded six factors. Convergent validity, discriminant validity and concurrent validity results indicated a satisfactory psychometric value. Sociodemographic and disease-related predictors of BF were observed.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese BFS demonstrated good patient acceptability and exhibited strong psychometric properties among Chinese patients with early-stage cancer. There were differences between Chinese cancer patients' benefit finding and patients with cancer in foreign countries, domestic cancer patients revealed high score in social relationship and family relationship dimension. Educational level, monthly individual income, treatment and physical exercise were the predictors of Chinese cancer patients' benefit finding.

摘要

目的

在考虑跨文化影响后,将益处发现量表(BFS)从英文改编为中文版,验证该工具在评估早期癌症的华语患者中的益处,并分析益处发现与社会人口统计学及疾病相关变量之间的关系。

方法

在研究的第一部分,通过制定指南,在充分考虑跨文化影响的情况下,从英文版改编出中文BFS。使用翻译效度指数评估翻译质量,并在第二和第三部分对早期癌症患者(N1 = 200,N2 = 351)进行量表施测,以进一步完善。对中文BFS进行信度、维度和结构效度分析。通过方差分析和回归模型分析益处发现与社会人口统计学及疾病相关变量之间的关系。

结果

在初步测试中,中文BFS受到患者的好评。Cronbach's α系数和组内相关系数超过0.7,因子分析产生六个因子。收敛效度、区分效度和同时效度结果表明具有令人满意的心理测量价值。观察到益处发现的社会人口统计学和疾病相关预测因素。

结论

中文BFS在早期癌症的中国患者中表现出良好的患者可接受性和强大的心理测量特性。中国癌症患者的益处发现与国外癌症患者存在差异,国内癌症患者在社会关系和家庭关系维度上得分较高。教育水平、个人月收入、治疗和体育锻炼是中国癌症患者益处发现的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Application and evaluation of Benefit Finding Scale (BFS) in early-stage cancer patients from China.益处发现量表(BFS)在中国早期癌症患者中的应用与评价
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Aug;23:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 26.
2
Construct validity of the 17-item Benefit Finding Scale in Chinese cancer patients and their family caregivers: a cross-sectional study.中文版17项益处发现量表在中国癌症患者及其家庭照顾者中的结构效度:一项横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Aug;25(8):2387-2397. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3644-5. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
3
Chinese Version of the Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale for Gynecological Cancer Survivors: A Psychometric Study in Taiwan.中文版妇科癌症幸存者生存顾虑评估量表:台湾的心理计量学研究。
J Nurs Res. 2019 Oct;27(5):e41. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000323.
4
The Chinese version of hospital anxiety and depression scale: Psychometric properties in Chinese cancer patients and their family caregivers.医院焦虑抑郁量表中文版:中国癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的心理测量特性
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec;25:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Translation and psychometric validation of the traditional Chinese version of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pediatric-25 Profile version 2.0 (PROMIS-25) in Chinese Children with Cancer in Hong Kong.香港癌症儿童中患者报告结局测量信息系统儿童 25 项简表版本 2.0(PROMIS-25)中文版的翻译及心理计量学验证。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1779-1791. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02759-8. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
The 22-Item Benefit Finding Scale: Validation and Application among Patients with Cervical Cancer in Ethnic Minority Areas of Southwestern China.22 项益处发现量表:中国西南部少数民族地区宫颈癌患者的验证与应用。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 4;2022:8977011. doi: 10.1155/2022/8977011. eCollection 2022.
7
Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Breast Cancer Survivor Self-efficacy Scale in China.中文版乳腺癌幸存者自我效能量表在中国的翻译、效度和信度。
Cancer Nurs. 2019 Sep/Oct;42(5):E31-E40. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000637.
8
Development of the Chinese version of Meaning in Life Scale for cancer patients and psychometric evaluation.癌症患者生命意义量表中文版的编制及心理测量学评价
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Nov;26(21-22):3298-3304. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13675. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
9
Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.牛津膝关节评分中文版在膝骨关节炎患者中的验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2992-3004. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5495-2. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
10
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the autoimmune bullous disease quality of life (ABQOL) questionnaire.自身免疫性大疱性疾病生活质量(ABQOL)问卷中文版的信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 2;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0594-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectories of dyadic quality of life in young to middle-aged stroke couples: a longitudinal study.年轻至中年中风夫妇的二元生活质量轨迹:一项纵向研究。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Mar;34(3):669-681. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03839-1. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
2
The Interrelationship of Benefit Finding, Stigma, and Suicide Risk Among Patients with Schizophrenia and Their Caregivers: A Six-Month Follow-Up Study.精神分裂症患者及其照料者中获益发现、耻辱感与自杀风险的相互关系:一项为期六个月的随访研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;12(21):2176. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212176.
3
Benefit finding and its influencing factors in patients with thyroid cancer: A retrospective study.
甲状腺癌患者的获益发现及其影响因素:一项回顾性研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Sep 6;11(11):100584. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100584. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
The Interrelationship of Benefit Finding, Demoralization, and Stigma among Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Their Caregivers.帕金森病患者及其照料者中获益发现、士气低落和耻辱感之间的相互关系。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 23;12(9):878. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090878.
5
Association between self-disclosure and benefit finding of Chinese cancer patients caregivers: the mediation effect of coping styles.中文癌症患者照顾者的自我表露与获益发现的关系:应对方式的中介作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Nov 10;31(12):684. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08158-8.
6
Physio-psycho-social interaction mechanism in dyadic health of young and middle-aged stroke survivors and their spousal caregivers: a longitudinal observational study protocol.中青年脑卒中幸存者及其配偶照护者二元健康的生理-心理-社会交互作用机制:一项纵向观察研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 11;13(4):e065767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065767.
7
Optimism and symptoms of anxiety and depression among Chinese women with breast cancer: the serial mediating effect of perceived social support and benefit finding.中国乳腺癌女性的乐观与焦虑和抑郁症状:感知社会支持和获益发现的连续中介效应。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04261-y.
8
The 22-Item Benefit Finding Scale: Validation and Application among Patients with Cervical Cancer in Ethnic Minority Areas of Southwestern China.22 项益处发现量表:中国西南部少数民族地区宫颈癌患者的验证与应用。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 4;2022:8977011. doi: 10.1155/2022/8977011. eCollection 2022.
9
Effectiveness of a brief positive skills intervention to improve psychological adjustment in patients with end-stage kidney disease newly initiated on haemodialysis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (HED-Start).一项简短的积极技能干预措施对新开始血液透析的终末期肾病患者心理调整效果的随机对照试验方案(HED-Start)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 21;11(9):e053588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053588.
10
The Benefit Finding Questionnaire (BFQ): Scale Development, Validation, and Its Psychometric Properties Among People with Mental Illness.益处发现问卷(BFQ):量表的编制、验证及其在精神疾病患者中的心理测量特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 26;8(3):303. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030303.