• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

22 项益处发现量表:中国西南部少数民族地区宫颈癌患者的验证与应用。

The 22-Item Benefit Finding Scale: Validation and Application among Patients with Cervical Cancer in Ethnic Minority Areas of Southwestern China.

机构信息

Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 4;2022:8977011. doi: 10.1155/2022/8977011. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/8977011
PMID:36017019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9371820/
Abstract

Recently, the Benefit Finding Scale (BFS) has been translated and culturally adapted for use in China. However, further validation of the instrument is required before it can be used in the management of patients with cervical cancer in China. In this study, we conducted the questionnaire survey and examined its properties. This methodological study was conducted at a tumor hospital located in southwestern China. Patients with cervical cancer who had been reexamined in the outpatient department of the hospital and hospitalized from June to August 2019 were selected. The item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability analysis were tested. The relationships between benefit finding and sociodemographic and disease-related variables were analyzed by ANOVA and regression models. A total of 247 patients were assessed (mean age: 48.0 ± 13.3 years). Educational level, self-perceived disease severity, and physical exercise were the predictors of benefit finding. The correlation coefficient between 22 items and their dimensions was the best. EFA analysis supported a five-factor model for structure validity. All Cronbach's alpha for the Chinese version of the BFS (BFS-C) was greater than 0.80. The results demonstrated the good reliability and validity of BFS-C. It appears to be a useful scale to assess experience of benefit finding among patients with cervical cancer in China.

摘要

最近,《益处发现量表》(BFS)已被翻译成中文并进行了文化适应性调整,以便在中国使用。然而,在将该工具用于中国宫颈癌患者的管理之前,还需要对其进行进一步验证。在这项研究中,我们进行了问卷调查,并检验了其特性。这是一项在中国西南部一家肿瘤医院进行的方法学研究。该研究选取了 2019 年 6 月至 8 月在医院门诊复查并住院的宫颈癌患者。对项目分析、探索性因子分析(EFA)和可靠性分析进行了测试。通过方差分析和回归模型分析了益处发现与社会人口学和疾病相关变量之间的关系。共评估了 247 名患者(平均年龄:48.0±13.3 岁)。教育程度、自我感知的疾病严重程度和体育锻炼是益处发现的预测因素。22 个项目与它们的维度之间的相关系数最好。EFA 分析支持结构效度的五因素模型。中文版 BFS(BFS-C)的所有 Cronbach's alpha 值均大于 0.80。结果表明 BFS-C 具有良好的信度和效度。它似乎是一种评估中国宫颈癌患者益处发现体验的有用量表。

相似文献

1
The 22-Item Benefit Finding Scale: Validation and Application among Patients with Cervical Cancer in Ethnic Minority Areas of Southwestern China.22 项益处发现量表:中国西南部少数民族地区宫颈癌患者的验证与应用。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 4;2022:8977011. doi: 10.1155/2022/8977011. eCollection 2022.
2
Application and evaluation of Benefit Finding Scale (BFS) in early-stage cancer patients from China.益处发现量表(BFS)在中国早期癌症患者中的应用与评价
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Aug;23:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 26.
3
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
4
Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer between the Han nationality and ethnic minorities in the Yunnan Province of China.中国云南省汉族和少数民族宫颈癌患者的生活质量。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 May 3;23(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02240-3.
5
Psychometric testing of the Mandarin version of the 34-item Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey in patients with cancer in mainland China.中国大陆癌症患者34项简明支持性护理需求调查问卷中文版的心理测量学测试
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Nov;25(11):3329-3338. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3750-4. Epub 2017 May 27.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 Among Patients Who Have Undergone Total Knee Arthroplasty.中文版 Tampa 运动恐惧量表-11 在全膝关节置换术后患者中的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.076. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.中文版 Morisky 药物依从性量表八条目版在系统性红斑狼疮中国患者中的信度和效度。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;41(9):2713-2720. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06195-y. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of medical maximizer-minimizer scale: a cross-sectional study.医学最大化-最小化量表中文版的翻译与验证:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e042432. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042432.
9
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
The Chinese version of Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN): Assessment of reliability and validity.《护生专业态度量表》中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive behavioral stress management affects different dimensions of benefit finding in breast cancer survivors: a multilevel mediation model.认知行为压力管理影响乳腺癌幸存者益处发现的不同维度:一个多层次中介模型。
Psychol Health. 2025 Jan;40(1):47-66. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2184840. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring positive psychosocial sequelae in patients with advanced cancer.测量晚期癌症患者的积极心理社会后果。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 Sep;13(6):703-712. doi: 10.1037/tra0000944. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Physical activity and cancer: A growing evidence base.身体活动与癌症:不断增长的证据基础。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Jul;29(4):e13295. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13295.
3
Exploratory Factor Analysis of a Patient-Centered Cancer Care Measure to Support Improved Assessment of Patients' Experiences.以患者为中心的癌症护理措施的探索性因素分析,以支持对患者体验的改善评估。
Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):351-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
4
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.2018 年宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的估计:全球分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
6
A randomized controlled trial of a guided self-disclosure intervention to facilitate benefit finding in Chinese breast cancer patients: Study protocol.一项针对中国乳腺癌患者的引导式自我表露干预促进获益发现的随机对照试验:研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Aug;75(8):1805-1814. doi: 10.1111/jan.14042. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
7
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Acceptance, social support, benefit-finding, and depression in women with gynecological cancer.妇科癌症女性的接纳、社会支持、受益发现与抑郁。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2991-3002. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1953-x. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Factors moderating the mutual impact of benefit finding between Chinese patients with cancer and their family caregivers: A cross-sectional study.调节癌症患者及其家庭照顾者之间获益发现相互影响的因素:一项横断面研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Oct;27(10):2363-2373. doi: 10.1002/pon.4833. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
The relationship between coping styles and benefit finding of Chinese cancer patients: The mediating role of distress.中国癌症患者应对方式与益处发现之间的关系:痛苦的中介作用。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Jun;34:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 7.