Phys Sportsmed. 1986 Nov;14(11):65-9. doi: 10.1080/00913847.1986.11709222.
In brief: It has been suggested that ten minutes of rope skipping is equal to 30 minutes of jogging for improved cardiovascular efficiency. This study compared physiological adaptations to six-week programs of jogging and rope skipping. Twenty-six sedentary volunteers (17 women and nine men) aged 18 to 35 years were assigned to a jogging, rope-skipping, or control group. Training frequency was five times per week; each session was 30 minutes for the jogging group and ten minutes for the rope-skipping groups. Significant differences (p <.05) in o2 max were observed in each group. o2 max increased 5.1 ml· kg(-1)· min(-1) for the jogging group (13%) and 2.8 ml· kg(-1)· min(-1) for the rope-skipping group (7%). The rope-skipping group had higher injury and drop-out rates. It was concluded that ten minutes of rope skipping does not elicit a training response comparable to 30 minutes of jogging.
有人认为,跳绳十分钟相当于慢跑三十分钟,可提高心血管效率。本研究比较了六周慢跑和跳绳训练计划对生理适应的影响。26 名久坐志愿者(17 名女性和 9 名男性)年龄在 18 至 35 岁之间,被分配到慢跑组、跳绳组或对照组。训练频率为每周 5 次,每次 30 分钟,而跳绳组每次 10 分钟。观察到每个组的最大摄氧量(o2 max)都有显著差异(p <.05)。慢跑组的 o2 max 增加了 5.1ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)(13%),跳绳组增加了 2.8ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)(7%)。跳绳组的受伤和退出率更高。结论是,十分钟的跳绳运动并不能引起与三十分钟慢跑相当的训练反应。