Matsumoto Akiyo, Arita Kaida
Department of Surgery, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;23(12):3941-3947. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5442-6. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
The gold standard of rectal surgery is TME and DST anastomosis.1 6 The division of mesorectum in tumor-specific mesorectal and total mesorectal excisions is one of the most difficult procedures of anterior dissection. We have developed a laparoscopic-assisted anterior dissection technique using the simple Rectum Catcher device (RC) with an intraoperative colonoscopy (CF).7 8 METHODS: Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between 99 patients undergoing a laparoscopic approach with the RC and a CF (RCF) and 104 patients undergoing the laparoscopic approach without the RC and without a CF (NRCF). Our standardized procedure for RCF is shown in the video.
BMI (p = .025) and tumor diameter (p = .002) were significantly higher in the RCF group. However, operation times (p = .005) and time to tolerate diet (p = .009) were significantly shorter. Estimated blood loss was significantly decreased (p = .005) and quality of TME or TSME was significantly better (p = .017) in the RCF group. When we further analyzed surgical and oncological outcomes by dividing 3 parts of the rectum, patients with rectosigmoid (Rs) cancer and patients with cancer in the rectum below the peritoneal reflection (Rb) had comparable results. Particularly, statistically significant differences in length of operation time (p = .018), estimated blood loss (p = .050), quality of TME or TSME (p = .017), time to tolerate diet (p = .010), and R0 resections (p = .050) were observed in the patients with cancer below the peritoneal reflection.
Laparoscopic lower rectal surgery using the RC with a CF is feasible and provides acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.
直肠手术的金标准是全直肠系膜切除术(TME)和双吻合器技术(DST)吻合术。1 6 在肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术和全直肠系膜切除术中,直肠系膜的分离是前方解剖最困难的步骤之一。我们开发了一种腹腔镜辅助前方解剖技术,使用简单的直肠捕手装置(RC)和术中结肠镜检查(CF)。7 8 方法:比较了99例采用带RC和CF的腹腔镜手术方法(RCF)的患者与104例未采用RC和CF的腹腔镜手术方法(NRCF)的患者的手术和肿瘤学结果。我们的RCF标准化手术过程见视频。
RCF组的体重指数(p = 0.025)和肿瘤直径(p = 0.002)显著更高。然而,手术时间(p = 0.005)和耐受饮食时间(p = 0.009)显著更短。RCF组的估计失血量显著减少(p = 0.005),TME或TSME的质量显著更好(p = 0.017)。当我们通过将直肠分为三部分进一步分析手术和肿瘤学结果时,直肠乙状结肠(Rs)癌患者和腹膜反折以下直肠(Rb)癌患者的结果相当。特别是,在腹膜反折以下癌患者中,观察到手术时间长度(p = 0.018)、估计失血量(p = 0.050)、TME或TSME质量(p = 0.017)、耐受饮食时间(p = 0.010)和R0切除率(p = 0.050)存在统计学显著差异。
使用RC和CF进行腹腔镜低位直肠手术是可行的,并能提供可接受的手术和肿瘤学结果。