• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The dispositions of things: the non-human dimension of power and ethics in patient-centred medicine.事物的处置方式:以患者为中心的医学中权力与伦理的非人类维度
Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Sep;38(7):1043-57. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12431. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
2
Anthropology and bioethics.人类学与生物伦理学。
Med Anthropol Q. 1992 Mar;6(1):49-73. doi: 10.1525/maq.1992.6.1.02a00040.
3
Ethics of patient activation: exploring its relation to personal responsibility, autonomy and health disparities.患者激活的伦理:探索其与个人责任、自主性和健康差距的关系。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct;43(10):670-675. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104260. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
4
The Role of Patients: Shared Decision-Making.患者的角色:共同决策。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017 Aug;50(4):689-708. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
Person centred care and shared decision making: implications for ethics, public health and research.以人为本的护理和共同决策:对伦理学、公共卫生和研究的影响。
Health Care Anal. 2012 Sep;20(3):231-49. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0183-y.
6
Understanding the trusted doctor and constructing a theory of bioethics.理解值得信赖的医生并构建生物伦理学理论。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2001;22(6):493-504. doi: 10.1023/a:1014430208720.
7
Thinking critically in medicine and its ethics: relating applied science and applied ethics.医学及其伦理中的批判性思维:关联应用科学与应用伦理。
J Appl Philos. 1987;4(2):229-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1987.tb00220.x.
8
A bioethical framework to guide the decision-making process in the care of seriously ill patients.一个指导重症患者护理决策过程的生物伦理框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Aug 20;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0317-y.
9
Examining chronic care patient preferences for involvement in health-care decision making: the case of Parkinson's disease patients in a patient-centred clinic.探讨慢性护理患者在医疗决策中的参与偏好:以患者为中心诊所的帕金森病患者为例。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):655-664. doi: 10.1111/hex.12497. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
A patient-centered care ethics analysis model for rehabilitation.以患者为中心的康复护理伦理分析模型。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;92(9):818-27. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318292309b.

引用本文的文献

1
The integration of human and non-human actors to advance healthcare delivery: unpacking the role of actor-network theory, a systematic literature review.人类和非人类行为体的整合以推进医疗保健服务提供:剖析行动者网络理论的作用,一项系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):1342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11866-4.
2
Hope and Optimism in Pediatric Deep Brain Stimulation: Key Stakeholder Perspectives.儿科深部脑刺激中的希望与乐观:关键利益相关者观点
Neuroethics. 2023 Oct;16(3). doi: 10.1007/s12152-023-09524-3. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
3
Use of Measuring Tools in Practice Development Projects: A Critical Perspective.实践发展项目中测量工具的使用:批判性视角。
Can J Occup Ther. 2021 Mar;88(1):59-70. doi: 10.1177/0008417421994365. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Managing ethical uncertainty: implicit normativity and the sociology of ethics.管理伦理不确定性:隐性规范性与伦理学的社会学。
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Aug;42 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):21-34. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13010. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
"Putting people in charge of their own health and care?" Using meta-narrative review and the example of online sexual health services to re-think relationships between e-health and agency.“让人们负责自己的健康和护理?”通过元叙事综述,并以在线性健康服务为例,重新思考电子健康与代理之间的关系。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):838-848. doi: 10.1111/hex.12895. Epub 2019 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Sociology of Low Expectations: Recalibration as Innovation Work in Biomedicine.低期望社会学:生物医学中作为创新工作的重新校准
Sci Technol Human Values. 2015 Nov;40(6):998-1021. doi: 10.1177/0162243915585579.
2
Exploring the practice of patient centered care: The role of ethnography and reflexivity.探索以患者为中心的护理实践:人种志与反思性的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.050. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
3
Cultural health capital and the interactional dynamics of patient-centered care.文化健康资本与以患者为中心的互动动态。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
4
Deep brain stimulation in the media: over-optimistic portrayals call for a new strategy involving journalists and scientists in ethical debates.媒体中的深部脑刺激:过于乐观的描述呼吁采取一种新策略,让记者和科学家参与到伦理辩论中。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 May 10;5:16. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00016. eCollection 2011.
5
Preparing the ethical future of deep brain stimulation.为脑深部电刺激的伦理未来做好准备。
Surg Neurol. 2009 Dec;72(6):577-86; discussion 586. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.029. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
6
Deep brain stimulation for pediatric movement disorders.小儿运动障碍的脑深部电刺激疗法
Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2009 Jun;16(2):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2009.04.001.
7
"Currents of hope": neurostimulation techniques in U.S. and U.K. print media.“希望的潮流”:美国和英国印刷媒体中的神经刺激技术
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2007 Summer;16(3):312-6.
8
The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy.患者参与医疗保健咨询的意义:一种分类法。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Mar;64(6):1297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
9
Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework.患者参与治疗决策:构建更广泛概念框架的理由。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
10
Technogovernance: evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine.技术治理:基层医疗中的证据、主观性与临床诊疗
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):1022-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Sep 12.

事物的处置方式:以患者为中心的医学中权力与伦理的非人类维度

The dispositions of things: the non-human dimension of power and ethics in patient-centred medicine.

作者信息

Gardner John, Cribb Alan

机构信息

Science and Technology Studies Unit, Department of Sociology, University of York, York, UK.

Department of Education and Professional Studies, Kings College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Sep;38(7):1043-57. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12431. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.12431
PMID:27460832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5026057/
Abstract

This article explores power relations between clinicians, patients and families as clinicians engage in patient-centred ethical work. Specifically, we draw on actor-network theory to interrogate the role of non-human elements in distributing power relations in clinical settings, as clinicians attempt to manage the expectations of patients and families. Using the activities of a multidisciplinary team providing deep brain stimulation to children with severe movement disorders as an example, we illustrate how a patient-centred tool is implicated in establishing relations that constitute four modes of power: 'power over', 'power to', "power storage" and "power/discretion". We argue that understanding the role of non-human elements in structuring power relations can guide and inform bioethical discussions on the suitability of patient-centred approaches in clinical settings.

摘要

本文探讨了临床医生、患者及其家属之间的权力关系,在此过程中临床医生开展以患者为中心的伦理工作。具体而言,我们运用行动者网络理论,审视非人类因素在临床环境中权力关系分配方面所起的作用,因为临床医生试图管理患者及其家属的期望。以一个多学科团队为患有严重运动障碍的儿童提供深部脑刺激的活动为例,我们阐述了一种以患者为中心的工具如何在建立构成四种权力模式的关系中发挥作用,这四种权力模式分别是“支配权”“行动权”“权力储存”和“权力/自由裁量权”。我们认为,理解非人类因素在构建权力关系中的作用,可以为关于以患者为中心的方法在临床环境中的适用性的生物伦理讨论提供指导和参考。