Lopez-Valcarcel Beatriz G, Barber Patricia
Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Management, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Tafira, 35320, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Feb;15(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0263-0.
This paper reviews economic and medical research publications to determine the extent to which the measures applied in Spain to control public health spending following the economic and financial crisis that began in 2008 have affected healthcare utilization, health and fairness within the public healthcare system. The majority of the studies examined focus on the most controversial cutbacks that came into force in mid-2012. The conclusions drawn, in general, are inconclusive. The consequences of this new policy of healthcare austerity are apparent in terms of access to the system, but no systematic effects on the health of the general population are reported. Studies based on indicators of premature mortality, avoidable mortality or self-perceived health have not found clear negative effects of the crisis on public health. The increased demands for co-payment provoked a short-term cutback in the consumption of medicines, but this effect faded after 12-18 months. No deterioration in the health of immigrants after the onset of the crisis was unambiguously detected. The impact of the recession on the general population in terms of diseases associated with mental health is well documented; however, the high levels of unemployment are identified as direct causes. Therefore, social policies rather than measures affecting the healthcare system would be primarily responsible. In addition, some health problems have a clear social dimension, which seems to have become more acute during the crisis, affecting in particular the most vulnerable population groups and the most disadvantaged social classes, thus widening the inequality gap.
本文回顾了经济和医学研究出版物,以确定西班牙在2008年开始的经济和金融危机后为控制公共卫生支出而采取的措施在多大程度上影响了公共医疗体系内的医疗服务利用、健康状况和公平性。大多数被审查的研究聚焦于2012年年中生效的最具争议性的削减措施。总体而言,得出的结论尚无定论。这项新的医疗紧缩政策的后果在医疗体系的可及性方面显而易见,但未报告对普通人群健康有系统性影响。基于过早死亡率、可避免死亡率或自我感知健康指标的研究未发现危机对公共卫生有明显负面影响。共付费用要求的增加导致药品消费短期内减少,但这种影响在12 - 18个月后消退。危机爆发后未明确检测到移民健康状况恶化。经济衰退对普通人群心理健康相关疾病的影响有充分记录;然而,高失业率被确定为直接原因。因此,主要责任在于社会政策而非影响医疗体系的措施。此外,一些健康问题具有明显的社会层面,在危机期间似乎变得更加尖锐,尤其影响最脆弱的人群和最弱势的社会阶层,从而扩大了不平等差距。