Patterson Jillian A, Stuart Elizabeth A, Ford Jane B
Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Jul 26;9:367. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2169-1.
A recent topic of interest in the blood transfusion literature is the existence of adverse effects of transfusing red cells towards the end of their storage life. This interest has been sparked by conflicting results in observational studies, however a number of methodological difficulties with these studies have been noted. One potential strategy to address these difficulties is the use of propensity scores, of which there are a number of possible methods. This study aims to compare the traditional methods for binary exposures with more recently developed generalised propensity score methods.
Data were obtained from probabilistically linked hospital, births and blood bank databases for all women giving birth from 23 weeks gestation in New South Wales, Australia, between July 2006 and December 2010 with complete information on the birth admission and blood issued. Analysis was restricted to women who received 1-4 units of red cells. Three different propensity score methods (for binary, ordinal and continuous exposures) were compared, using each of four different approaches to estimating the effect (matching, stratifying, weighting and adjusting by the propensity score). Each method was used to determine the effect of blood storage time on rates of severe morbidity and readmission or transfer.
Data were available for 2990 deliveries to women receiving 1-4 units of red cells. The rate of severe maternal morbidity was 3.7 %, and of readmission or transfer was 14.4 %. There was no association between blood storage time and rates of severe morbidity or readmission irrespective of the approach used. There was no single optimal propensity score method; the approaches differed in their ease of implementation and interpretation.
Within an obstetric population, there was no evidence of an increase in adverse events following transfusion of older blood. Propensity score methods provide a useful tool for addressing the question of adverse events with increasing storage time of blood, as these methods avoid many of the pitfalls of previous studies. In particular, generalised propensity scores can be used in situations where the exposure is not binary.
输血文献中近期一个受关注的话题是输注接近保存期末的红细胞是否存在不良反应。观察性研究结果相互矛盾引发了这一关注,不过已注意到这些研究存在一些方法学上的困难。解决这些困难的一种潜在策略是使用倾向评分,其有多种可能的方法。本研究旨在比较二元暴露的传统方法与最近开发的广义倾向评分方法。
数据来自澳大利亚新南威尔士州2006年7月至2010年12月期间所有孕周23周及以上分娩且有完整分娩入院和发放血液信息的产妇的概率关联医院、出生和血库数据库。分析仅限于接受1 - 4单位红细胞的女性。比较了三种不同的倾向评分方法(用于二元、有序和连续暴露),使用四种不同的估计效应方法(匹配、分层、加权和按倾向评分调整)中的每一种。每种方法都用于确定血液保存时间对严重发病率以及再入院或转院率的影响。
有2990例接受1 - 4单位红细胞的产妇的数据。严重孕产妇发病率为3.7%,再入院或转院率为14.4%。无论采用何种方法,血液保存时间与严重发病率或再入院率之间均无关联。没有单一的最佳倾向评分方法;这些方法在实施和解释的难易程度上有所不同。
在产科人群中,没有证据表明输注陈旧血液后不良事件会增加。倾向评分方法为解决随着血液保存时间增加的不良事件问题提供了一个有用的工具,因为这些方法避免了以往研究中的许多缺陷。特别是,广义倾向评分可用于暴露不是二元的情况。