• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出生地与大容量输血相关的结局:一项观察性研究。

Place of birth and outcomes associated with large volume transfusion: an observational study.

机构信息

The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, Women and Babies Research, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

Northern Sydney Local Health District, Kolling Institute, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04091-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-04091-y
PMID:34517834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8439088/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that women at high risk of postpartum haemorrhage deliver at facilities able to handle heavy bleeding. However postpartum haemorrhage is often unexpected. This study aims to compare outcomes and health service use related to transfusion of ≥4 units of red blood cells between women delivering in tertiary and lower level hospitals.

METHODS

The study population was women giving birth in public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, between July 2006 and December 2010. Data were obtained from linked hospital, birth and blood bank databases. The exposure of interest was transfusion of four or more units of red cells during admission for delivery. Outcomes included maternal morbidity, length of stay, neonatal morbidity and need for other blood products or transfer to higher care. Multivariable regression models were developed to predict need of transfusion of ≥4 units of red cells using variables known early in pregnancy and those known by the birth admission.

RESULTS

Data were available for 231,603 births, of which 4309 involved a blood transfusion, with 1011 (0.4%) receiving 4 or more units. Women giving birth in lower level and/or smaller hospitals were more likely to receive ≥4 units of red cells. Women receiving ≥4 units in tertiary settings were more likely to receive other blood products and have longer hospital stays, but morbidity, readmission and hysterectomy rates were similar. Although 46% of women had no identifiable risk factors early in pregnancy, 20% of transfusions of ≥4 units occurred within this group. By the birth admission 70% of women had at least one risk factor for requiring ≥4 units of red cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall outcomes for women receiving ≥4 units of red cells were comparable between tertiary and non-tertiary facilities. This is important given the inability of known risk factors to predict many instances of postpartum haemorrhage.

摘要

背景

指南建议有产后大出血高危风险的妇女在能够处理大出血的医疗机构分娩。然而,产后出血往往是意料之外的。本研究旨在比较在三级和较低级别医院分娩的妇女之间与输注≥4 单位红细胞相关的结局和卫生服务利用。

方法

研究人群为 2006 年 7 月至 2010 年 12 月期间在澳大利亚新南威尔士州公立医院分娩的妇女。数据来自医院、分娩和血库数据库的链接。感兴趣的暴露是分娩期间输注≥4 单位红细胞。结局包括产妇发病率、住院时间、新生儿发病率以及是否需要其他血液制品或转至更高护理。使用妊娠早期已知的变量和分娩入院时已知的变量,开发了多变量回归模型来预测是否需要输注≥4 单位的红细胞。

结果

共获得 231603 例分娩数据,其中 4309 例涉及输血,1011 例(0.4%)接受了≥4 单位红细胞。在较低级别和/或较小医院分娩的妇女更有可能接受≥4 单位的红细胞。在三级医院接受≥4 单位红细胞的妇女更有可能接受其他血液制品并住院时间更长,但发病率、再入院率和子宫切除术率相似。尽管 46%的妇女在妊娠早期没有明确的风险因素,但≥4 单位红细胞的输血中有 20%发生在该组。在分娩入院时,70%的妇女至少有一种需要输注≥4 单位红细胞的风险因素。

结论

在三级和非三级设施中,接受≥4 单位红细胞的妇女的总体结局相似。考虑到已知的风险因素无法预测许多产后出血的情况,这一点很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce0f/8439088/d6b99e59bc30/12884_2021_4091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce0f/8439088/d6b99e59bc30/12884_2021_4091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce0f/8439088/d6b99e59bc30/12884_2021_4091_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Place of birth and outcomes associated with large volume transfusion: an observational study.出生地与大容量输血相关的结局:一项观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04091-y.
2
Trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage, 2003-2011.2003 - 2011年产后出血的趋势与结局
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 15;15:334. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0788-5.
3
Outcomes associated with transfusion in low-risk women with obstetric haemorrhage.低风险产科出血妇女输血的相关结局。
Vox Sang. 2018 Oct;113(7):678-685. doi: 10.1111/vox.12707. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
4
The epidemiology and outcomes of women with postpartum haemorrhage requiring massive transfusion with eight or more units of red cells: a national cross-sectional study.需要大量输注8个或更多单位红细胞的产后出血女性的流行病学及结局:一项全国性横断面研究。
BJOG. 2016 Dec;123(13):2164-2170. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13831. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
5
Assessing the effect of risk factors on rates of obstetric transfusion over time using two methodological approaches.运用两种方法学方法评估随时间推移的产科输血率的危险因素的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0595-6.
6
Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth.首次分娩产科输血后后续妊娠结局。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 28;13(9):e0203195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203195. eCollection 2018.
7
Reporting postpartum haemorrhage with transfusion: a comparison of NSW birth and hospital data.报告伴有输血的产后出血:新南威尔士州出生与医院数据的比较
N S W Public Health Bull. 2014 Jun;24(4):153-8. doi: 10.1071/NB13008.
8
Clinical characteristics of women captured by extending the definition of severe postpartum haemorrhage with 'refractoriness to treatment': a cohort study.将“治疗抵抗”纳入严重产后出血定义扩展后所捕获的女性的临床特征:一项队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2499-9.
9
Interventional radiology in obstetric patients: A population-based record linkage study of use and outcomes.介入放射学在产科患者中的应用:一项基于人群的记录链接研究,评估其使用情况和结局。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Mar;102(3):370-377. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14508. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
10
Postpartum obstetric red cell transfusion practice: A retrospective study in a tertiary obstetric centre.产后产科红细胞输血实践:在一家三级产科中心的回顾性研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;58(2):170-177. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12680. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
A composite neonatal adverse outcome indicator using population-based data: an update.一项利用基于人群的数据的综合新生儿不良结局指标:最新情况
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Aug 12;5(1):1337. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1337.
2
Massive blood transfusion in relation to delivery: incidence, trends and risk factors: a population-based cohort study.大量输血与分娩的关系:发生率、趋势和危险因素:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2019 Dec;126(13):1577-1586. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15927. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Potential Effects of Regionalized Maternity Care on U.S. Hospitals.
区域化产妇保健对美国医院的潜在影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;134(3):545-552. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003397.
4
Patient blood management in obstetrics: prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. A NATA consensus statement.产科患者血液管理:预防和治疗产后出血。澳大利亚围手术期麻醉师协会共识声明。
Blood Transfus. 2019 Mar;17(2):112-136. doi: 10.2450/2019.0245-18. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
Women receiving massive transfusion due to postpartum hemorrhage: A comparison over time between two nationwide cohort studies.产后出血导致大量输血的妇女:两项全国性队列研究的时间比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jun;98(6):795-804. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13542. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
Predicting peripartum blood transfusion in women undergoing cesarean delivery: A risk prediction model.预测行剖宫产术的产妇围产期输血:风险预测模型。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 14;13(12):e0208417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208417. eCollection 2018.
7
Development and validation of a predictive model for excessive postpartum blood loss: A retrospective, cohort study.产后出血量过多预测模型的建立与验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
8
Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage.实践公告第 183 号:产后出血。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):e168-e186. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351.
9
Postpartum hemorrhage with transfusion: Trends, near misses, risk factors and management at the scale of a perinatal network.产后出血伴输血:围产期网络规模下的趋势、险些发生的失误、风险因素及管理
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 May;46(5):455-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
10
Risk for postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, and hemorrhage-related morbidity at low, moderate, and high volume hospitals.低、中、高容量医院产后出血、输血及出血相关并发症的风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Apr;31(8):1025-1034. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1306050. Epub 2017 Apr 3.