Schuhbaeck Annika, Schmid Jasmin, Zimmer Thomas, Muschiol Gerd, Hell Michaela M, Marwan Mohamed, Achenbach Stephan
Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct;10(5):343-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 17.
Recent guidelines for the workup of patients with chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease include coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). However, its diagnostic value may be limited in patients with severe coronary calcification.
We investigated the relationship between the extent of coronary calcium and the ability of coronary CTA to rule out significant stenoses in a series of consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
2614 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease in whom coronary calcium scoring and coronary CTA had been performed by Dual Source CT were analyzed. The ability of coronary CTA to rule out coronary artery stenoses (fully evaluable coronary arteries and absence of any luminal stenosis >75%) was analyzed relative to the coronary calcium score.
The median coronary calcium score was 12, with calcium present in 60.5% of all patients. Coronary CTA ruled out stenoses in 82% of patients, while in 18% of patients at least one stenosis was found or could not be excluded. The threshold above which coronary CTA permitted to rule out stenoses in less than 50% of patients was an "Agatston Score" of 287. This threshold was significantly lower for male patients (213 vs. 330), for patients with a heart rate >65 beats/min (157 vs. 317) and for patients with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2) (208 vs. 392). The evaluability of coronary arteries decreased with increasing amounts of calcium and differed significantly between heart rates ≤65 beats/min and >65 beats/min (p < 0.0001).
In the largest patient series evaluated so far, we identified an "Agatston Score" of 287 to represent a threshold above which coronary CTA permits to rule out coronary artery stenoses in less than 50% of cases.
近期有关胸痛及疑似冠状动脉疾病患者检查的指南纳入了冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)。然而,其在严重冠状动脉钙化患者中的诊断价值可能有限。
我们在一系列连续的疑似冠状动脉疾病患者中,研究了冠状动脉钙化程度与冠状动脉CTA排除显著狭窄能力之间的关系。
分析了2614例连续接受双源CT进行冠状动脉钙化评分及冠状动脉CTA检查的疑似冠状动脉疾病患者。相对于冠状动脉钙化评分,分析了冠状动脉CTA排除冠状动脉狭窄(完全可评估的冠状动脉且无任何管腔狭窄>75%)的能力。
冠状动脉钙化评分中位数为12,60.5%的患者存在钙化。冠状动脉CTA排除了82%患者的狭窄,而18%的患者发现至少一处狭窄或无法排除狭窄。冠状动脉CTA在不到50%的患者中排除狭窄的阈值是“阿加斯顿评分”287。该阈值在男性患者中显著更低(213对330),在心率>65次/分钟的患者中(157对317)以及体重指数≥25kg/m²的患者中(208对392)更低。冠状动脉的可评估性随着钙含量增加而降低,且在心率≤65次/分钟和>65次/分钟的患者之间有显著差异(p<0.0001)。
在迄今为止评估的最大患者系列中,我们确定“阿加斯顿评分”287为一个阈值,高于此阈值时冠状动脉CTA在不到50%的病例中能够排除冠状动脉狭窄。