Ruigrok Tom J H, van Touw Sven, Coulon Patrice
Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Equipe P3M - UMR 7298, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS Marseille, France.
Front Neural Circuits. 2016 Jul 11;10:46. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00046. eCollection 2016.
Apart from the genetically engineered, modified, strains of rabies virus (RABV), unmodified 'fixed' virus strains of RABV, such as the 'French' subtype of CVS11, are used to examine synaptically connected networks in the brain. This technique has been shown to have all the prerequisite characteristics for ideal tracing as it does not metabolically affect infected neurons within the time span of the experiment, it is transferred transneuronally in one direction only and to all types of neurons presynaptic to the infected neuron, number of transneuronal steps can be precisely controlled by survival time and it is easily detectable with a sensitive technique. Here, using the 'French' CVS 11 subtype of RABV in Wistar rats, we show that some of these characteristics may not be as perfect as previously indicated. Using injection of RABV in hind limb muscles, we show that RABV-infected spinal motoneurons may already show lysis 1 or 2 days after infection. Using longer survival times we were able to establish that Purkinje cells may succumb approximately 3 days after infection. In addition, some neurons seem to resist infection, as we noted that the number of RABV-infected inferior olivary neurons did not progress in the same rate as other infected neurons. Furthermore, in our hands, we noted that infection of Purkinje cells did not result in expected transneuronal labeling of cell types that are presynaptic to Purkinje cells such as molecular layer interneurons and granule cells. However, these cell types were readily infected when RABV was injected directly in the cerebellar cortex. Conversely, neurons in the cerebellar nuclei that project to the inferior olive did not take up RABV when this was injected in the inferior olive, whereas these cells could be infected with RABV via a transneuronal route. These results suggest that viral entry from the extracellular space depends on other factors or mechanisms than those used for retrograde transneuronal transfer. We conclude that transneuronal tracing with RABV may result in unexpected results, as not all properties of RABV seem to be ubiquitously valid.
除了基因工程改造的狂犬病病毒(RABV)毒株外,未修饰的“固定”RABV病毒株,如CVS11的“法国”亚型,被用于研究大脑中突触连接的网络。该技术已被证明具有理想示踪所需的所有先决特性,因为在实验时间范围内它不会对受感染的神经元产生代谢影响,它仅沿一个方向进行跨神经元传递,并且传递到受感染神经元突触前的所有类型的神经元,跨神经元步骤的数量可以通过存活时间精确控制,并且用灵敏的技术很容易检测到。在此,我们在Wistar大鼠中使用RABV的“法国”CVS 11亚型,发现其中一些特性可能并不像之前所表明的那样完美。通过将RABV注射到后肢肌肉中,我们发现受RABV感染的脊髓运动神经元在感染后1或2天可能就已经出现裂解。通过延长存活时间,我们能够确定浦肯野细胞可能在感染后约3天死亡。此外,一些神经元似乎能抵抗感染,因为我们注意到受RABV感染的下橄榄核神经元数量的增长速度与其他受感染神经元不同。此外,在我们的实验中,我们注意到浦肯野细胞的感染并未导致对浦肯野细胞突触前细胞类型(如分子层中间神经元和颗粒细胞)的预期跨神经元标记。然而,当将RABV直接注射到小脑皮质时,这些细胞类型很容易被感染。相反,投射到下橄榄核的小脑核神经元在将RABV注射到下橄榄核时不会摄取RABV,而这些细胞可以通过跨神经元途径被RABV感染。这些结果表明,病毒从细胞外空间进入取决于除逆行跨神经元传递所涉及的因素或机制之外的其他因素或机制。我们得出结论,用RABV进行跨神经元示踪可能会导致意外结果,因为RABV的并非所有特性似乎都普遍适用。