Voor In 't Holt Anne F, Wattel Agnes A, Boers Stefan A, Jansen Ruud, Hays John P, Goessens Wil H F, Vos Margreet C
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Molecular Biology, Regional Laboratory of Public Health, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 27;11(7):e0160156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160156. eCollection 2016.
Since the year 2000 there has been a sharp increase in the prevalence of healthcare-related infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. However, the high community prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates means that many E. coli typing techniques may not be suitable for detecting E. coli transmission events. Therefore, we investigated if High-throughput MultiLocus Sequence Typing (HiMLST) and/or Raman spectroscopy were suitable techniques for detecting recent E. coli transmission events.
This study was conducted from January until December 2010 at Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Isolates were typed using HiMLST and Raman spectroscopy. A genetic cluster was defined as two or more patients carrying identical isolates. We used predefined definitions for epidemiological relatedness to assess healthcare-related transmission.
We included 194 patients; strains of 112 patients were typed using HiMLST and strains of 194 patients were typed using Raman spectroscopy. Raman spectroscopy identified 16 clusters while HiMLST identified 10 clusters. However, no healthcare-related transmission events were detected. When combining data from both typing techniques, we identified eight clusters (n = 34 patients), as well as 78 patients with a non-cluster isolate. However, we could not detect any healthcare-related transmission in these 8 clusters.
Although clusters were genetically detected using HiMLST and Raman spectroscopy, no definite epidemiological relationships could be demonstrated which makes the possibility of healthcare-related transmission events highly unlikely. Our results suggest that typing of ESBL-producing E. coli using HiMLST and/or Raman spectroscopy is not helpful in detecting E. coli healthcare-related transmission events.
自2000年以来,产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的大肠埃希菌引起的医疗相关感染患病率急剧上升。然而,产ESBL大肠埃希菌分离株在社区中的高流行率意味着许多大肠埃希菌分型技术可能不适用于检测大肠埃希菌传播事件。因此,我们调查了高通量多位点序列分型(HiMLST)和/或拉曼光谱是否是检测近期大肠埃希菌传播事件的合适技术。
本研究于2010年1月至12月在荷兰鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学医学中心进行。使用HiMLST和拉曼光谱对分离株进行分型。基因簇定义为两名或更多患者携带相同的分离株。我们使用预先定义的流行病学相关性定义来评估医疗相关传播。
我们纳入了194名患者;112名患者的菌株使用HiMLST进行分型,194名患者的菌株使用拉曼光谱进行分型。拉曼光谱鉴定出16个簇,而HiMLST鉴定出10个簇。然而,未检测到医疗相关传播事件。当结合两种分型技术的数据时,我们鉴定出8个簇(n = 34名患者),以及78名携带非簇分离株的患者。然而,在这8个簇中我们未检测到任何医疗相关传播。
尽管使用HiMLST和拉曼光谱在基因层面检测到了簇,但无法证明明确的流行病学关系,这使得医疗相关传播事件的可能性极小。我们的结果表明,使用HiMLST和/或拉曼光谱对产ESBL的大肠埃希菌进行分型无助于检测大肠埃希菌医疗相关传播事件。