Department of Surgery, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Surgery, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.060. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
The influence of oral antibiotic use together with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on surgical site infection (SSI) rate, length of hospital stay and total hospital costs in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were evaluated in this study.
Data from 90 consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between October 2006 and September 2009 was analyzed retrospectively. All patients received MBP. Patients in group A were given oral antibiotics (a total 480 mg of gentamycin, 4 gr of metronidazole in two divided doses and 2 mg of bisacodyl PO), whereas patients in group B received no oral antibiotics. Exclusion criteria were emergent operations, laparoscopic operations, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, intraoperative colonoscopy prior to the creation of an anastomosis or antibiotic use within the previous 10 days. SSI, length of hospital stays and total hospital charges were evaluated.
Patients in both study groups, group A (n = 45) and group B (n = 45), were similar in terms of age, BMI, diverting ileostomy creation, localization and stage of the disease. Patients receiving oral antibiotics demonstrated a lower rate of wound infections (36% vs. 71%, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (8.1 ± 2.4 days vs. 14.2 ± 10.9 days, respectively, p < 0.001) and similar rates for anastomotic leakage (2% vs. 11%, p = 0.20). The mean ± SD total hospital charges were significantly lower in Group A (2.699 ± 0.892$) than that in Group B (4.411 ± 4.995$, p = 0.029).
Preoperative oral antibiotic use with MBP may provide faster recovery with less SSI and hospital charges.
本研究旨在评估在接受择期结直肠手术的患者中,口服抗生素联合机械肠道准备(MBP)对手术部位感染(SSI)发生率、住院时间和总住院费用的影响。
回顾性分析 2006 年 10 月至 2009 年 9 月期间连续 90 例接受择期结直肠切除术的患者数据。所有患者均接受 MBP。A 组患者给予口服抗生素(共 480mg 庆大霉素、4g 甲硝唑分两次服用和 2mg 比沙可啶 PO),B 组患者未给予口服抗生素。排除标准为急诊手术、腹腔镜手术、术前放化疗、吻合前术中结肠镜检查或术前 10 天内使用抗生素。评估 SSI、住院时间和总住院费用。
两组患者(A 组 n=45 例,B 组 n=45 例)在年龄、BMI、预防性造口术、疾病定位和分期方面相似。接受口服抗生素的患者伤口感染率较低(36%比 71%,p<0.001),住院时间较短(8.1±2.4 天比 14.2±10.9 天,p<0.001),吻合口漏发生率相似(2%比 11%,p=0.20)。A 组的平均总住院费用明显低于 B 组(2.699±0.892$比 4.411±4.995$,p=0.029)。
MBP 联合口服抗生素可能会加快恢复速度,减少 SSI 和住院费用。