Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Cincinnati, OH.
Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Surgery. 2018 Mar;163(3):528-534. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
Before elective colectomy, many advocate mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, whereas enhanced recovery pathways avoid mechanical bowel preparations. The optimal preparation for right versus left colectomy is also unclear. We sought to determine which strategy for bowel preparation decreases surgical site infection (SSI) and anastomotic leak (AL).
Elective colectomies from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy database (2012-2015) were divided by (1) type of bowel preparation: no preparation (NP), mechanical preparation (MP), oral antibiotics (PO), or mechanical and oral antibiotics (PO/MP); and (2) type of colonic resection: right, left, or segmental colectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified predictors of SSI and AL, and their risk-adjusted incidence was determined by logistic regression.
When analyzed as the odds ratio compared with NP, the PO and PO/MP groups were associated with a decrease in SSI (PO = 0.70 [0.55-0.88] and PO/MP = 0.47 [0.42-0.53]; P < .01). Use of PO/MP was associated with a decrease in SSI across all types of resections (right colectomy = 0.40 [0.33-0.50], left colectomy = 0.57 [0.47-0.68], and segmental colectomy = 0.43 (0.34-0.54); P < .01). Similarly, use of PO/MP was associated with a decrease in AL in left colectomy = 0.50 ([0.37-0.69]; P < .01) and segmental colectomy = 0.53 ([0.36-0.80]; P < .01).
Mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics is the preferred preoperative preparation strategy in elective colectomy because of decreased incidence of SSI and AL.
在择期结肠切除术之前,许多人主张使用机械肠道准备和口服抗生素,而加速康复途径则避免使用机械肠道准备。对于右半结肠切除术和左半结肠切除术,哪种准备方法最佳也尚不清楚。我们旨在确定哪种肠道准备策略可降低手术部位感染(SSI)和吻合口漏(AL)的发生率。
从国家手术质量改进计划结肠切除术数据库(2012-2015 年)中按(1)肠道准备类型:无准备(NP)、机械准备(MP)、口服抗生素(PO)或机械和口服抗生素(PO/MP);和(2)结肠切除术类型:右半结肠切除术、左半结肠切除术或节段性结肠切除术进行分组。单变量和多变量分析确定 SSI 和 AL 的预测因素,并通过逻辑回归确定其风险调整发生率。
与 NP 相比,PO 和 PO/MP 组的 SSI 发生率降低(PO=0.70[0.55-0.88]和 PO/MP=0.47[0.42-0.53];P<.01)。PO/MP 的使用与所有类型的切除术的 SSI 发生率降低相关(右半结肠切除术=0.40[0.33-0.50]、左半结肠切除术=0.57[0.47-0.68]和节段性结肠切除术=0.43[0.34-0.54];P<.01)。同样,PO/MP 的使用与左半结肠切除术的 AL 发生率降低相关(=0.50[0.37-0.69];P<.01)和节段性结肠切除术的 AL 发生率降低相关(=0.53[0.36-0.80];P<.01)。
在择期结肠切除术中,机械肠道准备加用口服抗生素是首选的术前准备策略,因为它可以降低 SSI 和 AL 的发生率。