Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):955-964. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14202. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
To validate a symptom-based fistula screening questionnaire and estimate obstetric fistula (OF) prevalence in rural Nepal.
Cross-sectional and nested case-control study.
Sarlahi District, Nepal.
Parous, reproductive age women.
The questionnaire assessed symptoms of vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistula (VVF and RVF, respectively), stress and urge urinary incontinence (SUI and UUI, respectively), fecal incontinence (FI), and included interviewer observations on the smell and presence of urine and/or stool. All women who screened positive for OF and a randomly selected group of women who screened negative for OF were included in a nested case-control study (one case, four normal controls, and four incontinent controls) and underwent confirmatory clinical examinations.
Clinically confirmed OF, and questionnaire sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp).
Of the 16 893 women who completed cross-sectional screening, 68 were screened-positive cases. Fifty-five (82%) screened-positive cases, 203 screened-negative normal controls, and 203 screened-incontinent controls participated in the case-control study, which confirmed one case of VVF and one case of both VVF and RVF without any false-negative cases. For VVF, the screening tool demonstrated Se 100% (95% CI 34.2-100.0%), Sp 86.9% (95% CI 83.3-89.9%), and estimated VVF prevalence as 12 per 100 000 (95% CI 3-43); for RVF, it demonstrated Se 100% (95% CI 20.7-100.0), Sp 99.8% (95% CI 98.6-100.0), and estimated RVF prevalence as 6 per 100 000 (95% CI 1-34).
The OF screening questionnaire demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in this low-prevalence setting.
Community-based obstetric fistula screening tool validation study, Nepal, n = 16 893: High Se, Sp & feasibility.
验证一种基于症状的瘘筛查问卷,并估计尼泊尔农村地区的产科瘘(OF)患病率。
横断面和嵌套病例对照研究。
尼泊尔萨拉斯瓦蒂区。
经产、育龄妇女。
问卷评估了阴道膀胱瘘(VVF)和直肠阴道瘘(RVF)、压力性和急迫性尿失禁(SUI 和 UUI)、粪便失禁的症状,并包括了对尿液和/或粪便气味和存在的观察者访谈。所有 OF 筛查阳性的妇女和随机选择的 OF 筛查阴性的妇女均纳入嵌套病例对照研究(1 例病例,4 例正常对照,4 例失禁对照)并接受了确认性临床检查。
临床确诊的 OF,以及问卷的敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)。
在完成横断面筛查的 16893 名妇女中,有 68 名筛查阳性病例。55 例(82%)筛查阳性病例、203 例筛查阴性正常对照和 203 例筛查阳性失禁对照参加了病例对照研究,该研究确认了 1 例 VVF 和 1 例 VVF 和 RVF 病例,没有任何假阴性病例。对于 VVF,该筛查工具的 Se 为 100%(95%CI 34.2-100.0%),Sp 为 86.9%(95%CI 83.3-89.9%),估计 VVF 患病率为 12/10 万(95%CI 3-43);对于 RVF,它的 Se 为 100%(95%CI 20.7-100.0%),Sp 为 99.8%(95%CI 98.6-100.0%),估计 RVF 患病率为 6/10 万(95%CI 1-34)。
在这种低患病率环境下,OF 筛查问卷表现出了较高的敏感性和特异性。
尼泊尔基于社区的产科瘘筛查工具验证研究,n=16893:高 Se、Sp 和可行性。