• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活压力与功能障碍关系中的复杂性:一个典型例子——紧张性头痛。

Complexities in life stress-dysfunction relationships: a case in point--tension headache.

作者信息

Hovanitz C A, Chin K, Warm J S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Ohio 45221.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 1989 Feb;12(1):55-75. doi: 10.1007/BF00844749.

DOI:10.1007/BF00844749
PMID:2746643
Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to evaluate the role of disregulation in tension headache and (2) to demonstrate how disregulation may lead to erroneous inferences about the etiological role of stress in tension headache. A headache group (N = 25; ages 18 to 30) and a control group (N = 25; ages 10 to 25) matched for sex and roughly equated for psychopathology and self-report life stress was selected after screening 1219 undergraduate students. Measures of self-reported acute stress and headache status, vigilance performance, frontalis EMG, and peripheral temperature were obtained. Both groups were assessed before, during, and after a stressful hour-long vigilance task. The results provide the frequently sought but rarely, if ever, obtained support for Schwartz's disregulation model. As disregulation was apparent with respect to both self-report acute stress and life stress, the results also suggest that reliance on self-report measures of life stress in studies of the physical outcomes of life stress may conceal the process by which life events results in physical dysfunction.

摘要

本研究有两个目的

(1)评估调节紊乱在紧张性头痛中的作用;(2)证明调节紊乱如何导致对压力在紧张性头痛中的病因学作用的错误推断。在对1219名本科生进行筛查后,选取了一个头痛组(N = 25;年龄18至30岁)和一个对照组(N = 25;年龄10至25岁),两组在性别上匹配,且在精神病理学和自我报告的生活压力方面大致相当。获取了自我报告的急性压力和头痛状况、警觉表现、额肌肌电图以及外周温度的测量数据。两组在长达一小时的紧张警觉任务之前、期间和之后均接受了评估。研究结果为施瓦茨的调节紊乱模型提供了人们经常寻求但却很少(如果有的话)获得的支持。由于在自我报告的急性压力和生活压力方面调节紊乱都很明显,研究结果还表明,在生活压力对身体影响的研究中,依赖生活压力的自我报告测量方法可能会掩盖生活事件导致身体功能障碍的过程。

相似文献

1
Complexities in life stress-dysfunction relationships: a case in point--tension headache.生活压力与功能障碍关系中的复杂性:一个典型例子——紧张性头痛。
J Behav Med. 1989 Feb;12(1):55-75. doi: 10.1007/BF00844749.
2
Tension headache: disregulation at some levels of stress.紧张性头痛:某些压力水平下的调节失调。
J Behav Med. 1990 Dec;13(6):539-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00844734.
3
Psychophysiological comparisons of three kinds of headache subjects during and between headache states: analysis of post-stress adaptation periods.三种头痛患者在头痛发作期间及发作间隔的心理生理比较:应激后适应期分析
J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(4):427-41. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90029-7.
4
Stress, headache, and physiological disregulation: a time-series analysis of stress in the laboratory.压力、头痛与生理失调:实验室压力的时间序列分析
Headache. 1998 Feb;38(2):116-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3802116.x.
5
Psychophysiological and MMPI personality assessment of headaches: an integrative approach.
Headache. 1993 Mar;33(3):149-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1993.hed3303149.x.
6
Minor stressful life events (daily hassles) in chronic primary headache: relationship with MMPI personality patterns.
Headache. 1992 Jul;32(7):330-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1992.hed3207330.x.
7
Tension headaches: relation between MMPI paranoïa score and pain and between MMPI hypochondriasis score and frontalis EMG.
Headache. 1986 Jul;26(7):365-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1986.hed2607365.x.
8
Electromyographic and affective responses of episodic tension-type headache patients and headache-free controls during stressful task performance.发作性紧张型头痛患者和无头痛对照组在应激任务执行过程中的肌电图和情感反应。
J Behav Med. 1992 Feb;15(1):89-112. doi: 10.1007/BF00848379.
9
The relationship of electromyographic and vasomotor activity to MMPI subgroups in chronic headache patients: the use of the original and contemporary MMPI norms.
Headache. 1989 Oct;29(9):584-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1989.hed2909584.x.
10
Psychophysiological characteristics of headache patients.头痛患者的心理生理特征。
Pain. 1984 Jan;18(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90125-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Appraisal of subjective stress in individuals with tension-type headache: the influence of baseline measures.紧张型头痛患者主观压力评估:基线测量的影响
J Behav Med. 1998 Oct;21(5):469-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1018736410261.
2
Tension headache: disregulation at some levels of stress.紧张性头痛:某些压力水平下的调节失调。
J Behav Med. 1990 Dec;13(6):539-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00844734.

本文引用的文献

1
The treatment of tension headache--I Muscular abnormality and biofeedback.
Behav Res Ther. 1981;19(6):485-8. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(81)90075-9.
2
Migraine symptoms on the Waters Headache Questionnaire: a statistical analysis.
J Psychosom Res. 1981;25(4):281-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(81)90005-2.
3
Psychophysiological investigation of muscle-contraction and migraine headache.肌肉收缩与偏头痛的心理生理学研究。
J Psychosom Res. 1981;25(4):271-80. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(81)90004-0.
4
The stress of boredom and monotony: a consideration of the evidence.无聊与单调带来的压力:对证据的考量。
Psychosom Med. 1981 Apr;43(2):165-76. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198104000-00008.
5
Expression of affect and physiological response in psychosomatic patients.
J Psychosom Res. 1981;25(3):143-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(81)90026-x.
6
Psychological functioning in headache sufferers.头痛患者的心理功能
Psychosom Med. 1982 May;44(2):171-82. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198205000-00003.
7
Stress and chronic headache: a psychophysiological analysis of mechanisms.压力与慢性头痛:机制的心理生理学分析
J Psychosom Res. 1982;26(2):167-82. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(82)90034-4.
8
Physiological reactivity and recent life-stress experience.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):467-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.467.
9
A comparison of MMPI personality data and frontalis electromyographic readings in two groups of daily headache sufferers.
Headache. 1983 Mar;23(2):83-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1983.hed2302083.x.
10
Influence of life event stress on physical illness: substantive effects or methodological flaws?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Apr;46(4):853-63. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.853.