Suppr超能文献

压力与慢性头痛:机制的心理生理学分析

Stress and chronic headache: a psychophysiological analysis of mechanisms.

作者信息

Feuerstein M, Bush C, Corbisiero R

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 1982;26(2):167-82. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(82)90034-4.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of three types of laboratory stressors (stressful imagery, mental arithmetic, pain) on temporal artery, skeletal muscle, general autonomic [digital blood volume pulse (DBVP), spontaneous resistance responses (SRR's)] and self-report measures of distress in chronic migraine, mixed, muscle contraction and non-headache controls. All subjects were female, free of medication at time of testing and equated for age. Headache subjects reported a 19 year history of headache. Results revealed a pattern of digital BVP (constriction), SSR's (increase) and frontal EMG (increase) indicative of a general autonomic-skeletal muscle arousal response to all three stressors in all groups, while the temporal artery response to the pain stimulus was vasodilation. Distress ratings were elevated during the stress periods for all four group. Pain threshold and tolerance and the tendency to utilize cognitive coping strategies during exposure to pain did not differ across the four groups. The results do not support the general autonomic dysfunction theory of migraine or the specificity hypothesis implicating an overreactive temporal artery or skeletal muscle response to stress in migraine and muscle contraction headache, respectively. Despite epidemiological research supporting the stress-headache relationship, the present results indicate that the psychophysiological mechanism underlying this relationship does not appear to involve abnormal tonic levels or phasic response to stress. It is argued that the temporal artery dilation response to pain questions the role of stress in triggering the two stage vasoconstriction-dilation mechanism of migraine and suggests the need to evaluate a four stage model as a potential psychophysiological mechanism underlying the stress-headache relationship.

摘要

本研究调查了三种类型的实验室应激源(应激性意象、心算、疼痛)对慢性偏头痛患者、混合型头痛患者、肌肉收缩型头痛患者以及非头痛对照组的颞动脉、骨骼肌、一般自主神经系统[数字血容量脉搏(DBVP)、自发抵抗反应(SRR)]和痛苦的自我报告测量指标的影响。所有受试者均为女性,测试时未服用药物,且年龄相当。头痛患者报告有19年的头痛病史。结果显示,所有组中数字BVP(收缩)、SRR(增加)和额肌电图(增加)的模式表明对所有三种应激源均存在一般自主神经-骨骼肌唤醒反应,而颞动脉对疼痛刺激的反应是血管舒张。在应激期间,所有四组的痛苦评分均升高。四组之间在疼痛阈值、耐受性以及在接触疼痛时使用认知应对策略的倾向方面没有差异。这些结果不支持偏头痛的一般自主神经功能障碍理论,也不支持特异性假说,即分别暗示偏头痛和肌肉收缩性头痛中颞动脉或骨骼肌对应激反应过度。尽管流行病学研究支持应激与头痛的关系,但目前的结果表明,这种关系背后的心理生理机制似乎并不涉及对应激的异常静息水平或相位反应。有人认为,颞动脉对疼痛的舒张反应对压力在引发偏头痛的两阶段血管收缩-舒张机制中的作用提出了质疑,并表明需要评估一个四阶段模型作为应激与头痛关系背后潜在的心理生理机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验