Steffener Jason, Gazes Yunglin, Habeck Christian, Stern Yaakov
PERFORM Center, Concordia University, MontrealQC, Canada; Centre de Recherche de l'Institut de Gériatrie de Montréal, MontréalQC, Canada; Department of Psychology, Concordia University, MontrealQC, Canada.
Cognitive Neuroscience Division, Department of Neurology and Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and The Aging Brain, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York NY, USA.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Jul 13;8:162. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00162. eCollection 2016.
Healthy aging simultaneously affects brain structure, brain function, and cognition. These effects are often investigated in isolation ignoring any relationships between them. It is plausible that age related declines in cognitive performance are the result of age-related structural and functional changes. This straightforward idea is tested in within a conceptual research model of cognitive aging. The current study tested whether age-related declines in task-performance were explained by age-related differences in brain structure and brain function using a task-switching paradigm in 175 participants. Sixty-three young and 112 old participants underwent MRI scanning of brain structure and brain activation. The experimental task was an executive context dual task with switch costs in response time as the behavioral measure. A serial mediation model was applied voxel-wise throughout the brain testing all pathways between age group, gray matter volume, brain activation and increased switch costs, worsening performance. There were widespread age group differences in gray matter volume and brain activation. Switch costs also significantly differed by age group. There were brain regions demonstrating significant indirect effects of age group on switch costs via the pathway through gray matter volume and brain activation. These were in the bilateral precuneus, bilateral parietal cortex, the left precentral gyrus, cerebellum, fusiform, and occipital cortices. There were also significant indirect effects via the brain activation pathway after controlling for gray matter volume. These effects were in the cerebellum, occipital cortex, left precentral gyrus, bilateral supramarginal, bilateral parietal, precuneus, middle cingulate extending to medial superior frontal gyri and the left middle frontal gyri. There were no significant effects through the gray matter volume alone pathway. These results demonstrate that a large proportion of the age group effect on switch costs can be attributed to individual differences in gray matter volume and brain activation. Therefore, age-related neural effects underlying cognitive control are a complex interaction between brain structure and function. Furthermore, the analyses demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing multiple neuroimaging modalities within a conceptual research model of cognitive aging.
健康衰老同时影响大脑结构、大脑功能和认知。这些影响通常被单独研究,而忽略了它们之间的任何关系。认知能力随年龄下降可能是与年龄相关的结构和功能变化的结果,这似乎是合理的。这一简单的观点在一个认知衰老的概念性研究模型中得到了检验。本研究使用任务转换范式,对175名参与者进行测试,以检验与年龄相关的任务表现下降是否可由大脑结构和大脑功能的年龄差异来解释。63名年轻参与者和112名老年参与者接受了大脑结构和大脑激活的MRI扫描。实验任务是一项执行情境双重任务,以反应时间中的转换成本作为行为指标。应用了一个全脑体素水平的系列中介模型,测试年龄组、灰质体积、大脑激活和转换成本增加(即表现变差)之间的所有路径。灰质体积和大脑激活存在广泛的年龄组差异。转换成本也因年龄组而有显著差异。存在一些脑区,显示年龄组通过灰质体积和大脑激活途径对转换成本有显著的间接影响。这些脑区包括双侧楔前叶、双侧顶叶皮层、左侧中央前回、小脑、梭状回和枕叶皮层。在控制了灰质体积后,通过大脑激活途径也有显著的间接影响。这些影响出现在小脑、枕叶皮层、左侧中央前回、双侧缘上回、双侧顶叶、楔前叶、扣带中部延伸至额上内侧回和左侧额中回。仅通过灰质体积途径没有显著影响。这些结果表明,年龄组对转换成本的影响很大一部分可归因于灰质体积和大脑激活的个体差异。因此,认知控制背后与年龄相关的神经效应是大脑结构和功能之间的复杂相互作用。此外,分析证明了在认知衰老的概念性研究模型中利用多种神经成像模式的可行性。