Jager Andrew J, Choudhry Shahid A, Marsteller Jill A, Telford Robin P, Wynia Matthew K
1 American Medical Association, Chicago, IL.
2 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Med Qual. 2017 Jul/Aug;32(4):423-437. doi: 10.1177/1062860616659132. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Variable success with quality improvement (QI) efforts in ambulatory care is often attributed to differences in local contexts. Identifying and addressing patient-, practice-, or community-level contextual factors might improve implementation of QI projects. The authors developed and validated a framework for a Practice Context Assessment (PCA), and then created the PCA instrument to glean insights from staff on contextual factors and distributed it at 10 ambulatory practice sites. The PCA framework showed acceptable expert-assessed content validity, with content validity index scores ranging from 0.74 (community engagement) to 0.97 (leadership). The PCA instrument comprised several scales grouped into 7 domains with Cronbach α scores from 0.83 (leadership) to 0.95 (patient and family engagement). The PCA framework provides a valid construct to help ambulatory practices understand contextual issues that might influence QI projects. A revised version of the PCA instrument is now ready for further testing.
门诊护理质量改进(QI)工作成效参差不齐,这往往归因于当地环境的差异。识别并解决患者、医疗机构或社区层面的背景因素,可能会改善QI项目的实施情况。作者开发并验证了一个门诊实践环境评估(PCA)框架,然后创建了PCA工具,以从工作人员那里收集有关背景因素的见解,并将其分发给10个门诊实践地点。PCA框架显示出可接受的专家评估内容效度,内容效度指数得分从0.74(社区参与)到0.97(领导力)不等。PCA工具由几个量表组成,分为7个领域,克朗巴哈α系数得分从0.83(领导力)到0.95(患者及家庭参与)。PCA框架提供了一个有效的结构,以帮助门诊实践了解可能影响QI项目的背景问题。PCA工具的修订版现已准备好进行进一步测试。