• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding Factors Influencing Quality Improvement Capacity Among Ambulatory Care Practices Across the MidSouth Region: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.理解影响中南部地区门诊护理实践质量改进能力的因素:一项探索性定性研究。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Jul/Sep;29(3):136-141. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000255.
2
Effects of Practice Turnover on Primary Care Quality Improvement Implementation.实践轮换对基层医疗质量改进实施的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):16-22. doi: 10.1177/1062860619844001. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Practice Facilitator Strategies for Addressing Electronic Health Record Data Challenges for Quality Improvement: EvidenceNOW.应对电子健康记录数据挑战以促进质量改进的实践促进者策略:EvidenceNOW。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):398-409. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170274.
4
Factors influencing the long-term sustainment of quality improvements made in addiction treatment facilities: a qualitative study.影响成瘾治疗设施质量改进持续的因素:一项定性研究。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017 Nov 1;12(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13722-017-0093-x.
5
Advanced practice quality improvement project: how to influence physician radiologic imaging ordering behavior.高级实践质量改进项目:如何影响医师的放射影像学检查申请行为。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Dec;11(12 Pt A):1155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.08.034. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
6
The Effects of Major Disruptions on Practice Participation in Facilitation During a Primary Care Quality Improvement Initiative.主要干扰因素对初级保健质量改进计划中促进实践参与的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;35(1):124-139. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210205.
7
Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the 'Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care' programme in English acute hospitals.探索医疗保健组织中质量改进干预措施的可持续性:一项为期 10 年的“生产病房:释放时间护理”计划在英国急性医院的影响的多方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):31-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009457. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
8
Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.门诊电子健康记录系统实施的循证管理:概念支持与定性证据评估
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
9
Factors influencing family physician engagement in practice-based quality improvement: Qualitative study.影响家庭医生参与以实践为基础的质量改进的因素:定性研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2023 May;69(5):e113-e119. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6905e113.
10
One size does not fit all: a qualitative content analysis of the importance of existing quality improvement capacity in the implementation of Releasing Time to Care: the Productive Ward™ in Saskatchewan, Canada.一刀切并不适用于所有情况:对加拿大萨斯喀彻温省实施“释放护理时间:高效病房™”过程中现有质量改进能力的重要性进行的定性内容分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 19;14:642. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0642-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Organizational characteristics associated with sustained participation in internal quality improvement: Findings from two waves of a national sample of physician practices in the United States.与持续参与内部质量改进相关的组织特征:来自美国全国医生执业样本两波调查的结果
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Mar;369:117826. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117826. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
2
Quality Improvement Capacity in a Department of Family Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Study.家庭医学科的质量改进能力:一项混合方法研究。
PRiMER. 2023 Jun 12;7:17. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2023.889614. eCollection 2023.
3
Development and validation of the Capacity to Treat Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder (CAP-POD) questionnaire.慢性疼痛治疗能力与阿片类药物使用障碍(CAP-POD)问卷的开发与验证
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Sep 15;1:2633489520948859. doi: 10.1177/2633489520948859. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
4
Designing an Efficient and Quality-focused Integrated Atrial Fibrillation Care Center.设计一个高效且注重质量的综合心房颤动护理中心。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022 Oct 15;13(10):5196-5201. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2022.13107. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Value-Based Healthcare From the Perspective of the Healthcare Professional: A Systematic Literature Review.基于价值的医疗保健:医疗专业人员的视角——系统文献回顾。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;9:800702. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.800702. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A resident-led project to improve documentation of overweight and obesity in a primary care clinic.一个由住院医师主导的项目,旨在改善初级保健诊所中超重和肥胖的记录情况。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2019 Nov 1;9(5):377-383. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2019.1681056. eCollection 2019.
2
Continuity Clinic Practice Feedback Curriculum for Residents: A Model for Ambulatory Education.住院医师连续性门诊实践反馈课程:门诊教育模式
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):189-195. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00714.1.
3
Contextual Conditions and Performance Improvement in Primary Care.基层医疗中的情境条件与绩效提升
Qual Manag Health Care. 2019 Apr/Jun;28(2):70-77. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000198.
4
Leveraging Health Information Technology in the Quest to Improve Health Care Value.利用健康信息技术追求提高医疗保健价值。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2019 Jan/Mar;28(1):63-64. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000196.
5
Use of Quality Improvement Strategies Among Small to Medium-Size US Primary Care Practices.美国中小型初级保健实践中质量改进策略的使用。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S35-S43. doi: 10.1370/afm.2172.
6
Quality Improvement to Immunization Coverage in Primary Care Measured in Medical Record and Population-Based Registry Data.在医疗记录和基于人群的登记数据中衡量初级保健中的免疫接种覆盖率的质量改进。
Acad Pediatr. 2018 May-Jun;18(4):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Group Visits for Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution in Primary Care: A Pilot Quality Improvement Initiative.初级保健中超剂量教育和纳洛酮分发的团体访视:一项试点质量改进计划。
Pain Med. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):2325-2330. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx243.
8
Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions Designed to Prevent Hospital Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.旨在预防医院再入院的质量改进干预措施的经济评估:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):975-985. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1136.
9
Evaluating investment in quality improvement capacity building: a systematic review.评估质量改进能力建设的投资:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e012431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012431.
10
A Systematic Review of Patient Safety Measures in Adult Primary Care.成人初级保健中患者安全措施的系统评价
Am J Med Qual. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):237-245. doi: 10.1177/1062860616644328. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

理解影响中南部地区门诊护理实践质量改进能力的因素:一项探索性定性研究。

Understanding Factors Influencing Quality Improvement Capacity Among Ambulatory Care Practices Across the MidSouth Region: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama (Dr Varley); Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Dr Varley); Department of Medicine (Drs Kripalani, Spain, Mixon, Rothman, and Limper) and MidSouth Practice Transformation Network (Drs Kripalani, Spain, Mixon, Rothman, and Limper and Ms Acord), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Jul/Sep;29(3):136-141. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000255.

DOI:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000255
PMID:32590488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7323868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Success in choosing and implementing quality metrics, necessary in a value-based care model, depends on quality improvement (QI) capacity-the shared knowledge, understanding, and commitment to continuous improvement. We set out to explore factors influencing QI capacity among ambulatory care practices in the MidSouth Practice Transformation Network.

METHODS

As part of network participation, 82 practices submitted a plan for implementing self-selected quality metrics. This plan asked practices to identify factors that would assist or impede successful implementation of interventions to meet metric targets. We used a qualitative thematic analysis approach to explore barriers and facilitators to developing QI capacity among ambulatory care practices.

RESULTS

Recurrent facilitators included external change agents, protected time for QI, a framework for improvement, and infrastructure including electronic health record (EHR) capabilities. Frequent barriers included lack of QI knowledge, lack of time, frequent staff turnover, inadequate EHR capabilities, lack of an internal change agent, and a belief that performance was outside of the practice's control.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide insight into factors influencing the adoption and implementation of QI metrics across a diverse group of ambulatory care practices and suggest that targeting the Inner Setting of practices may be an appropriate approach for developing practice-level QI capacity, which is necessary for success in a value-based care model.

摘要

背景与目的

成功选择和实施质量指标(在基于价值的医疗保健模式中是必要的)取决于质量改进(QI)能力——即对持续改进的共同知识、理解和承诺。我们着手探索影响中南部实践转型网络中门诊护理实践的 QI 能力的因素。

方法

作为网络参与的一部分,82 家实践提交了实施自行选择的质量指标的计划。该计划要求实践确定有助于或阻碍干预措施成功实施以达到指标目标的因素。我们使用定性主题分析方法来探索门诊护理实践中发展 QI 能力的障碍和促进因素。

结果

反复出现的促进因素包括外部变革推动者、QI 的保护时间、改进框架以及包括电子健康记录(EHR)能力在内的基础设施。常见的障碍包括缺乏 QI 知识、缺乏时间、频繁的员工流动、EHR 能力不足、缺乏内部变革推动者以及认为绩效超出实践控制范围的信念。

结论

这些发现深入了解了影响门诊护理实践采用和实施 QI 指标的因素,并表明针对实践的内在环境可能是发展实践层面 QI 能力的适当方法,这对于基于价值的医疗保健模式的成功是必要的。