Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):806-814. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
Although critical for improving patient outcomes, palliative care quality indicators are not yet widely used. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers to palliative care quality measurement and improvement might improve their use and program quality.
Development of a survey tool to assess palliative care team perspectives on facilitators and barriers to quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs.
We used the adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to define domains and constructs to select instruments. We assembled a draft survey and assessed content validity through pilot testing and cognitive interviews with experts and frontline practitioners for key items. We analyzed responses using a constant comparative process to assess survey item issues and potential solutions. We developed a final survey using these results.
The survey includes five published instruments and two additional item sets. Domains include organizational characteristics, individual and team characteristics, intervention characteristics, and process of implementation. Survey modules include Quality Improvement in Palliative Care, Implementing Quality Improvement in the Palliative Care Program, Teamwork and Communication, Measuring the Quality of Palliative Care, and Palliative Care Quality in Your Program. Key refinements from cognitive interviews included item wording on palliative care team members, programs, and quality issues.
This novel, adaptable instrument assesses palliative care team perspectives on barriers and facilitators for quality measurement and improvement in palliative care programs. Next steps include evaluation of the survey's construct validity and how survey results correlate with findings from program quality initiatives.
尽管姑息治疗质量指标对于改善患者预后至关重要,但它们尚未得到广泛应用。更好地了解姑息治疗质量测量和改进的促进因素和障碍,可能会提高其使用和项目质量。
开发一种调查工具,以评估姑息治疗团队对姑息治疗计划中质量测量和改进的促进因素和障碍的看法。
我们使用经过改编的实施研究综合框架来定义领域和结构,以选择工具。我们组装了一份草案调查,并通过专家和一线从业者的试点测试和认知访谈对关键项目进行了内容有效性评估。我们通过不断比较的过程分析了这些回应,以评估调查项目的问题和潜在解决方案。我们根据这些结果开发了最终的调查。
该调查包括五个已发表的工具和两个额外的项目集。领域包括组织特征、个人和团队特征、干预措施特征以及实施过程。调查模块包括姑息治疗中的质量改进、在姑息治疗计划中实施质量改进、团队合作和沟通、姑息治疗质量的测量以及您的计划中的姑息治疗质量。认知访谈中的关键改进包括姑息治疗团队成员、计划和质量问题的措辞。
这种新颖的、可适应的工具评估了姑息治疗团队对姑息治疗计划中质量测量和改进的促进因素和障碍的看法。下一步包括评估调查的结构有效性以及调查结果与计划质量举措的发现之间的相关性。