• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊护理研究中的知情同意:自相矛盾?

Informed consent in emergency care research: An oxymoron?

作者信息

Furyk Jeremy S, Lawton Luke D, Ting Joseph Ys, McD Taylor David

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

College of Public Health and Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Feb;29(1):110-112. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12642. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.12642
PMID:27469986
Abstract

Emergency care needs to be underpinned by the highest quality evidence. However, research involving critically ill patients in the emergency setting has unique ethical, logistical and regulatory issues. Informed consent is a well-established principle in conventional research. In this article, we discuss informed consent as it pertains to the difficulties of research in the emergency setting. Alternatives to informed consent are discussed. Human research ethics committees require a greater understanding of consent issues in emergency care research for Australia to remain competitive internationally.

摘要

急诊护理需要以最高质量的证据为支撑。然而,在急诊环境中对重症患者进行的研究存在独特的伦理、后勤和监管问题。知情同意是传统研究中一项既定原则。在本文中,我们讨论与急诊环境下研究困难相关的知情同意问题。还讨论了知情同意的替代方案。为使澳大利亚在国际上保持竞争力,人类研究伦理委员会需要更深入地理解急诊护理研究中的同意问题。

相似文献

1
Informed consent in emergency care research: An oxymoron?急诊护理研究中的知情同意:自相矛盾?
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Feb;29(1):110-112. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12642. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
Waiver of informed consent in prehospital emergency health research in Australia.澳大利亚院前紧急健康研究中的知情同意豁免
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2010 Mar;29(1):07.1-16. doi: 10.1007/BF03351323.
3
Qualitative evaluation of a deferred consent process in paediatric emergency research: a PREDICT study.儿科急诊研究中延迟同意程序的定性评估:一项PREDICT研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e018562. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018562.
4
The protection of unrepresented patients in emergency care research.保护急诊研究中未被代表的患者。
Account Res. 2018;25(1):21-36. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1404458. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
Research in Emergency and Critical Care Settings: Debates, Obstacles and Solutions.急诊与重症监护环境中的研究:争论、障碍与解决方案
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1605-1626. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9730-5. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
6
Confronting the ethical challenges to informed consent in emergency medicine research.应对急诊医学研究中知情同意面临的伦理挑战。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1082-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.05.028.
7
Ethical considerations of ensuring an informed and autonomous consent in research involving critically ill patients.在涉及重症患者的研究中确保知情且自主同意的伦理考量。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Sep;154(3 Pt 1):582-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810590.
8
Re-evaluating ethical concerns in planned emergency research involving critically ill patients: an interpretation of the guidance document from the United States Food and Drug Administration.重新评估涉及重症患者的计划性紧急研究中的伦理问题:对美国食品药品监督管理局指导文件的解读
J Clin Ethics. 2015 Spring;26(1):61-7.
9
Research conditions that qualify for emergency exception from informed consent.符合知情同意紧急例外情况的研究条件。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1040-4. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.022.
10
Is emergency research without initial consent justified?: the consent substitute model.未经初始同意的紧急研究是否合理?:同意替代模式。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):668-74. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.80.

引用本文的文献

1
Broad consent in the emergency department: a cross sectional study.急诊科的广泛同意:一项横断面研究。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Feb 18;83(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01529-z.
2
Take-home naloxone in multicentre emergency settings: the TIME feasibility cluster RCT.带离型纳洛酮在多中心急救环境中的应用:TIME 可行性集群 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(74):1-69. doi: 10.3310/YNRC8249.
3
Observing resuscitative practice. A novice researcher's experience of obtaining ethics approval.观察复苏实践。新手研究者获得伦理批准的经验。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(7-8):1190-1198. doi: 10.1177/09697330231166071. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
4
Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.从利益相关者处学习,为重症监护病房的研究同意提供良好实践指导:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e066149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066149.
5
Insisting on prospective consent in paediatric critical care research may be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.坚持在儿科重症监护研究中采用前瞻性同意可能是因噎废食。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Sep;58(9):1520-1524. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16144. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
6
Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient-public involvement contributors.增强重症监护研究招募和同意的策略:一项针对研究人员和患者-公众参与贡献者的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 22;11(9):e048193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048193.
7
Recommendations for clinical research in children presenting to primary care out-of-hours services: a randomised controlled trial with parallel cohort study.针对非工作时间就诊于基层医疗服务机构的儿童进行临床研究的建议:一项平行队列研究的随机对照试验
BJGP Open. 2021 Apr 26;5(2). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101154. Print 2021 Apr.
8
Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study.多中心急诊环境中可带回家的纳洛酮(TIME)方案:可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Jul 9;6:96. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00626-w. eCollection 2020.
9
A prehospital randomised controlled trial in South Africa: Challenges and lessons learnt.南非的一项院前随机对照试验:挑战与经验教训。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;9(3):145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
10
Ethical tensions in the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in emergency obstetric and newborn care in low and middle-income countries.在中低收入国家,产科和新生儿急救中随机临床试验的知情同意过程中的伦理紧张。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Apr 27;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0363-0.