Mahendru Amita A, Wilhelm-Benartzi Charlotte S, Wilkinson Ian B, McEniery Carmel M, Johnson Sarah, Lees Christoph
Fetal Medicine Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Department of Fetal Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;294(4):867-76. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4153-3. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Understanding the natural length of human pregnancy is central to clinical care. However, variability in the reference methods to assign gestational age (GA) confound our understanding of pregnancy length. Assignation from ultrasound measurement of fetal crown-rump length (CRL) has superseded that based on last menstrual period (LMP). Our aim was to estimate gestational length based on LMP, ultrasound CRL, and implantation that were known, compared to pregnancy duration assigned by day of ovulation.
Prospective study in 143 women trying to conceive. In 71 ongoing pregnancies, gestational length was estimated from LMP, CRL at 10-14 weeks, ovulation, and implantation day. For each method of GA assignment, the distribution in observed gestational length was derived and both agreement and correlation between the methods determined.
Median ovulation and implantation days were 16 and 27, respectively. The gestational length based on LMP, CRL, implantation, and ovulation was similar: 279, 278, 276.5 and 276.5 days, respectively. The distributions for observed gestational length were widest where GA was assigned from CRL and LMP and narrowest when assigned from implantation and ovulation day. The strongest correlation for gestational length assessment was between ovulation and implantation (r = 0.98) and weakest between CRL and LMP (r = 0.88).
The most accurate method of predicting gestational length is ovulation day, and this agrees closely with implantation day. Prediction of gestational length from CRL and known LMP are both inferior to ovulation and implantation day. This information could have important implications on the routine assignment of gestational age.
了解人类妊娠的自然时长是临床护理的核心。然而,用于确定孕周(GA)的参考方法存在差异,这使我们对妊娠时长的理解变得复杂。通过超声测量胎儿头臀长度(CRL)来确定孕周已取代了基于末次月经日期(LMP)的方法。我们的目的是根据已知的末次月经日期、超声CRL和着床情况来估计妊娠时长,并与根据排卵日确定的妊娠时长进行比较。
对143名试图受孕的女性进行前瞻性研究。在71例持续妊娠中,根据末次月经日期、孕10 - 14周时的CRL、排卵日和着床日来估计妊娠时长。对于每种确定孕周的方法,得出观察到的妊娠时长分布,并确定各方法之间的一致性和相关性。
排卵日和着床日的中位数分别为16天和27天。基于末次月经日期、CRL、着床和排卵的妊娠时长相似,分别为279天、278天、276.5天和276.5天。当根据CRL和末次月经日期确定孕周时,观察到的妊娠时长分布最宽,而根据着床日和排卵日确定孕周时分布最窄。妊娠时长评估的最强相关性存在于排卵日和着床日之间(r = 0.98),而CRL和末次月经日期之间的相关性最弱(r = 0.88)。
预测妊娠时长最准确的方法是排卵日,且这与着床日密切相关。根据CRL和已知末次月经日期预测妊娠时长均不如排卵日和着床日。这些信息可能对孕周的常规确定具有重要意义。