Bavishi Avni, Slade Martin D, Levy Becca R
Yale University School of Public Health, Laboratory of Epidemiology and Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Yale University School of Public Health, Laboratory of Epidemiology and Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
Although books can expose people to new people and places, whether books also have health benefits beyond other types of reading materials is not known. This study examined whether those who read books have a survival advantage over those who do not read books and over those who read other types of materials, and if so, whether cognition mediates this book reading effect. The cohort consisted of 3635 participants in the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study who provided information about their reading patterns at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were based on survival information up to 12 years after baseline. A dose-response survival advantage was found for book reading by tertile (HRT2 = 0.83, p < 0.001, HRT3 = 0.77, p < 0.001), after adjusting for relevant covariates including age, sex, race, education, comorbidities, self-rated health, wealth, marital status, and depression. Book reading contributed to a survival advantage that was significantly greater than that observed for reading newspapers or magazines (tT2 = 90.6, p < 0.001; tT3 = 67.9, p < 0.001). Compared to non-book readers, book readers had a 23-month survival advantage at the point of 80% survival in the unadjusted model. A survival advantage persisted after adjustment for all covariates (HR = .80, p < .01), indicating book readers experienced a 20% reduction in risk of mortality over the 12 years of follow up compared to non-book readers. Cognition mediated the book reading-survival advantage (p = 0.04). These findings suggest that the benefits of reading books include a longer life in which to read them.
尽管书籍能让人们接触到新的人物和地方,但书籍是否比其他类型的阅读材料更有益健康尚不清楚。本研究调查了读书的人是否比不读书的人和阅读其他类型材料的人具有生存优势,如果是,认知是否介导了这种读书效应。该队列由全国代表性的健康与退休研究中的3635名参与者组成,他们在基线时提供了有关阅读模式的信息。Cox比例风险模型基于基线后长达12年的生存信息。在调整了包括年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、合并症、自评健康、财富、婚姻状况和抑郁等相关协变量后,发现读书存在剂量反应生存优势(HRT2 = 0.83,p < 0.001,HRT3 = 0.77,p < 0.001)。读书带来的生存优势显著大于阅读报纸或杂志(tT2 = 90.6,p < 0.001;tT3 = 67.9,p < 0.001)。在未调整模型中,在80%生存率时,与不读书的人相比,读书的人有23个月的生存优势。在调整所有协变量后,生存优势仍然存在(HR = 0.80,p < 0.01),表明与不读书的人相比,读书的人在12年的随访中死亡风险降低了20%。认知介导了读书与生存优势之间的关系(p = 0.04)。这些发现表明,读书的好处包括有更长的寿命来阅读它们。