• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症患者和神经典型健康成年人阅读书籍时的理解、处理时间和模态偏好:一项初步研究。

Comprehension, Processing Time, and Modality Preferences When People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Healthy Adults Read Books: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Miami University, Oxford, OH.

Quality Living, Inc., Omaha, NE.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2569-2590. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00121. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00121
PMID:36167067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9911119/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many people with aphasia (PWA) want to read books. Text-to-speech (TTS) technology sometimes provides comprehension and processing time benefits when PWA read short, multisentence passages. Currently, no research examines the effect of TTS support when PWA read books.

AIMS

This study's primary purpose was to examine comprehension accuracy and total processing time of PWA and neurotypical healthy adults (NHAs) when reading book sections in read-only versus TTS-supported conditions. A secondary aim was to examine condition preference and perceived degree of understanding by people in both participant groups.

METHOD AND PROCEDURE

Ten PWA and 10 NHAs alternated between read-only and TTS-supported conditions to read a book. Participants answered comprehension questions and provided feedback about their reading experience, condition preference, and desire to use TTS technology for future book reading. Outcomes and Result: Overall, PWA exhibited less accurate comprehension and slower processing times compared to NHAs in both conditions. No significant comprehension accuracy difference occurred between conditions for either group. However, four PWA exhibited a 10% or greater increase in comprehension accuracy when receiving TTS support. A significant processing time difference occurred with PWA processing text faster with TTS support, whereas NHAs did not demonstrate processing time differences. Most PWA preferred the TTS condition and expressed a desire to use TTS technology in the future. Most NHAs expressed the opposite preference.

CONCLUSIONS

TTS support during book reading promotes faster processing without compromising comprehension for PWA. Clinicians should discuss with PWA the relative importance of comprehension accuracy, processing time, and comfort with technology when determining whether using TTS support during book reading is desirable.

摘要

背景

许多失语症患者(PWA)希望阅读书籍。当 PWA 阅读简短的多句段落时,文本转语音(TTS)技术有时会提供理解和处理时间方面的好处。目前,尚无研究检查 PWA 阅读书籍时 TTS 支持的效果。

目的

本研究的主要目的是检查 PWA 和神经典型健康成年人(NHA)在只读和 TTS 支持条件下阅读章节时的理解准确性和总处理时间。次要目的是检查这两个参与者群体的条件偏好和感知理解程度。

方法和程序

10 名 PWA 和 10 名 NHA 交替在只读和 TTS 支持条件下阅读一本书。参与者回答理解问题,并提供有关阅读体验、条件偏好和未来使用 TTS 技术阅读书籍的愿望的反馈。

结果

总的来说,与 NHA 相比,PWA 在两种条件下的理解准确性都较低,处理时间也较慢。两组在任何一种条件下都没有出现显著的理解准确性差异。然而,有 4 名 PWA 在接受 TTS 支持时,理解准确性提高了 10%或更多。对于 PWA,处理时间存在显著差异,TTS 支持下的处理速度更快,而 NHA 则没有表现出处理时间的差异。大多数 PWA 更喜欢 TTS 条件,并表示将来希望使用 TTS 技术。大多数 NHA 则表达了相反的偏好。

结论

在阅读书籍时使用 TTS 支持可以促进更快的处理速度,而不会影响 PWA 的理解。临床医生在确定在阅读书籍时是否使用 TTS 支持是否可取时,应与 PWA 讨论理解准确性、处理时间和对技术的舒适度的相对重要性。

相似文献

1
Comprehension, Processing Time, and Modality Preferences When People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Healthy Adults Read Books: A Pilot Study.失语症患者和神经典型健康成年人阅读书籍时的理解、处理时间和模态偏好:一项初步研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2569-2590. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00121. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Reading Comprehension and Processing Time When People With Aphasia Use Text-to-Speech Technology With Personalized Supports and Features.失语症患者使用具有个性化支持和功能的语音合成技术时的阅读理解和处理时间。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):342-358. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00182. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
Eye Fixation Behaviors and Processing Time of People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Adults When Reading Narratives With and Without Text-to-Speech Support.失语症患者和神经典型成年人在有和没有文本转语音支持的情况下阅读叙事文时的眼动注视行为和处理时间。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jan 12;66(1):276-295. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00298. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Experience of People With Aphasia Using Text-to-Speech Technology to Support Virtual Book Club Participation.使用语音合成技术支持虚拟读书俱乐部参与的失语症患者体验的混合方法探索。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Nov 6;32(6):2768-2791. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00094. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
5
Text-to-speech technology effects on reading rate and comprehension by adults with traumatic brain injury.文本转语音技术对患有创伤性脑损伤的成年人阅读速度和阅读理解能力的影响。
Brain Inj. 2013;27(12):1388-94. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.823649. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
6
Effect of Digital Highlighting on Reading Comprehension Given Text-to-Speech Technology for People with Aphasia.数字高亮对失语症患者使用文本转语音技术时阅读理解的影响。
Aphasiology. 2021;35(2):200-221. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1787728. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Reading behaviors and text-to-speech technology perceptions of people with aphasia.失语症患者的阅读行为和文本转语音技术感知。
Assist Technol. 2022 Sep 3;34(5):599-610. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1904306. Epub 2021 May 3.
8
Modality Synchronization When People With Aphasia Read With Text-to-Speech Support.当失语症患者使用语音合成器阅读时的模态同步。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 May;33(3):1504-1512. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00334. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Perceptions of people with aphasia about supporting reading with text-to-speech technology: A convergent mixed methods study.失语症患者对使用文本转语音技术支持阅读的看法:一项汇聚的混合方法研究。
J Commun Disord. 2021 May-Jun;91:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106098. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
10
Effect of Text-to-Speech Rate on Reading Comprehension by Adults With Aphasia.语音语速对成人失语症患者阅读理解的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):168-184. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00047. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Experience of People With Aphasia Using Text-to-Speech Technology to Support Virtual Book Club Participation.使用语音合成技术支持虚拟读书俱乐部参与的失语症患者体验的混合方法探索。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Nov 6;32(6):2768-2791. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00094. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Reading Comprehension and Processing Time When People With Aphasia Use Text-to-Speech Technology With Personalized Supports and Features.失语症患者使用具有个性化支持和功能的语音合成技术时的阅读理解和处理时间。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):342-358. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00182. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
Perceptions of people with aphasia about supporting reading with text-to-speech technology: A convergent mixed methods study.失语症患者对使用文本转语音技术支持阅读的看法:一项汇聚的混合方法研究。
J Commun Disord. 2021 May-Jun;91:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106098. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
3
Effect of Digital Highlighting on Reading Comprehension Given Text-to-Speech Technology for People with Aphasia.数字高亮对失语症患者使用文本转语音技术时阅读理解的影响。
Aphasiology. 2021;35(2):200-221. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1787728. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
4
Reading behaviors and text-to-speech technology perceptions of people with aphasia.失语症患者的阅读行为和文本转语音技术感知。
Assist Technol. 2022 Sep 3;34(5):599-610. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1904306. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Aphasia and acquired reading impairments: What are the high-tech alternatives to compensate for reading deficits?失语症与后天性阅读障碍:弥补阅读缺陷的高科技替代方法有哪些?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jan;56(1):161-173. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12569. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Technology-Enhanced Reading Therapy for People With Aphasia: Findings From a Quasirandomized Waitlist Controlled Study.技术增强型阅读疗法治疗失语症患者:一项准随机候补对照研究的结果。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Nov 25;62(12):4382-4416. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0484. Print 2019 Dec 18.
7
Effect of Text-to-Speech Rate on Reading Comprehension by Adults With Aphasia.语音语速对成人失语症患者阅读理解的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):168-184. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00047. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
8
Book Club Experiences, Engagement, and Reading Support Use by People With Aphasia.失语症患者的读书俱乐部体验、参与度和阅读支持使用情况。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1084-1098. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0237. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Effects of Written, Auditory, and Combined Modalities on Comprehension by People With Aphasia.书面、听觉和组合模态对失语症患者理解的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1206-1221. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0013. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Comprehension of Single Versus Combined Modality Information by People With Aphasia.失语症患者对单一模态与联合模态信息的理解。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):278-292. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0132.