Dunlop Claire A, Radaelli Claudio M
Department of Politics, University of Exeter, Amory Building, Exeter, EX4 4RJ UK.
Policy Sci. 2016;49:107-124. doi: 10.1007/s11077-015-9236-7. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
In response to the attacks on the sovereign debt of some Eurozone countries, European Union (EU) leaders have created a set of preventive and corrective policy instruments to coordinate macro-economic policies and reforms. In this article, we deal with the European Semester, a cycle of information exchange, monitoring and surveillance. Countries that deviate from the targets are subjected to increasing monitoring and more severe 'corrective' interventions, in a pyramid of responsive exchanges between governments and EU institutions. This is supposed to generate coordination and convergence towards balanced economies via mechanisms of learning. But who is learning what? Can the EU learn in the 'wrong' mode? We contribute to the literature on theories of the policy process by showing how modes of learning can be operationalized and used in empirical analysis. We use policy learning as theoretical framework to establish empirically the prevalent mode of learning and its implications for both the power of the Commission and the normative question of whether the EU is learning in the 'correct' mode.
针对对一些欧元区国家主权债务的攻击,欧盟领导人创建了一套预防性和纠正性政策工具,以协调宏观经济政策与改革。在本文中,我们探讨欧洲学期,这是一个信息交流、监督和监测的周期。偏离目标的国家会受到越来越多的监测以及更严厉的“纠正”干预,这发生在政府与欧盟机构之间呈金字塔状的回应性交流中。这旨在通过学习机制实现协调并朝着平衡经济的方向趋同。但谁在学习什么?欧盟会以“错误”的模式学习吗?我们通过展示学习模式如何在实证分析中得以实施和运用,为政策过程理论的文献做出贡献。我们将政策学习作为理论框架,以实证方式确立普遍的学习模式及其对委员会权力的影响,以及欧盟是否以“正确”模式学习这一规范性问题。