Azevedo Marco Antonio
University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos), São Leopoldo, Brazil
J Med Philos. 2016 Oct;41(5):461-79. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw016. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
In Unfit for the Future, Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu present a sophisticated argument in defense of the imperative of moral enhancement. They claim that without moral enhancement, the future of humanity is seriously compromised. The possibility of ultimate harm, caused by a dreadful terrorist attack or by a final unpreventable escalation of the present environmental crisis aggravated by the availability of cognitive enhancement, makes moral enhancement a top priority. It may be considered optimistic to think that our present moral capabilities can be successfully improved by means of moral education, moral persuasion, and fear of punishment. So, without moral enhancement, drastic restrictions on human freedom would become the only alternative to prevent those dramatic potential outcomes. In this article, I will try to show that we still have reason to be less pessimistic and that Persson & Savulescu's arguments are fortunately unconvincing.
在《不适合未来》一书中,英格玛·珀尔松和朱利安·萨夫勒斯库提出了一个复杂的论点,为道德提升的必要性辩护。他们声称,没有道德提升,人类的未来将受到严重损害。由可怕的恐怖袭击或当前环境危机因认知增强而最终不可避免地升级所导致的终极伤害的可能性,使道德提升成为当务之急。认为我们目前的道德能力可以通过道德教育、道德劝说和对惩罚的恐惧而成功提高,这可能被认为是乐观的。所以,没有道德提升,对人类自由的严厉限制将成为防止那些重大潜在后果的唯一选择。在本文中,我将试图表明我们仍有理由不那么悲观,而且幸运的是,珀尔松和萨夫勒斯库的论点并不令人信服。