Abramson M, Fay T H, Kelly J P, Wazen J J, Liden G, Tjellstrom A
Department of Otolaryngology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Laryngoscope. 1989 Jul;99(7 Pt 1):707-10. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198907000-00008.
During a 2-year period ending in July 1987, nine patients were implanted with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid developed at the University of Gothenburg and Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden. Patients selection was based on the presence of conductive or mixed hearing loss in patients who are unable to wear a conventional hearing aid because of infection or ear canal problems. Patients had speech discrimination scores of at least 60% for phonetically balanced monosyllables (CID lists) at 40 dB above threshold, and a pure tone bone conduction average of 45 dB hearing loss or better. Patients were evaluated in sound field, preoperatively and postoperatively using warble tones, speech reception threshold, speech discrimination, and synthetic speech identification. The patient's unaided hearing and hearing with a bone-anchored hearing aid were compared with the patient's hearing with a standard bone conduction hearing aid. Signal to noise ratio testing with the synthetic speech identification test demonstrated that the bone-anchored hearing aid was comparable to a standard bone conduction aid. There were no complications in our series. Five patients who reported otorrhea with conventional hearing aids experienced no otorrhea after implantation. Patient satisfaction, as assessed by questionnaire, revealed that all patients preferred the bone-anchored hearing aid to previously worn hearing aids.
在截至1987年7月的两年时间里,9名患者植入了瑞典哥德堡大学和查尔姆斯理工大学研发的经皮骨锚式助听器。患者选择基于存在传导性或混合性听力损失,且因感染或耳道问题无法佩戴传统助听器的患者。患者在阈值以上40分贝时,对语音平衡单音节(CID列表)的言语辨别得分至少为60%,纯音骨导平均听力损失为45分贝或更好。术前和术后在声场中使用啭音、言语接受阈值、言语辨别和合成语音识别对患者进行评估。将患者的无助听听力和使用骨锚式助听器的听力与患者使用标准骨导助听器的听力进行比较。合成语音识别测试的信噪比测试表明,骨锚式助听器与标准骨导助听器相当。我们的系列病例中没有并发症。5名报告使用传统助听器时有耳漏的患者在植入后未出现耳漏。通过问卷调查评估的患者满意度显示,所有患者都更喜欢骨锚式助听器,而不是以前佩戴的助听器。