Suppr超能文献

骨锚式助听器与传统助听器的比较。听力学结果及患者意见。

The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.

作者信息

Snik A F, Mylanus E A, Cremers C W

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995 Feb;28(1):73-83.

PMID:7739870
Abstract

The bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) was evaluated in 65 patients by comparing speech recognition and questionnaire results with those obtained with the patients' own previous hearing aids. In the majority of patients who previously used a conventional bone conductor, significantly improved speech recognition scores were found with the BAHA. The majority preferred the BAHA to their previous bone conductors. For the patients who previously used air conduction hearing aids but had to stop because of chronic draining ears, the results were ambiguous. Nevertheless, the BAHA seems to be the best solution for this subgroup as well. It is concluded that the BAHA is a valuable addition to the audiologists' tools.

摘要

通过将65名患者的言语识别和问卷调查结果与他们之前使用的助听器的结果进行比较,对骨锚式助听器(BAHA)进行了评估。在大多数之前使用传统骨传导器的患者中,使用BAHA后言语识别分数显著提高。大多数患者更喜欢BAHA而不是他们之前的骨传导器。对于那些之前使用气导助听器但因慢性耳漏而不得不停用的患者,结果并不明确。然而,BAHA似乎也是这个亚组的最佳解决方案。得出的结论是,BAHA是听力学家工具中的一项有价值的补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验